Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575733›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Intrapleural Instillation of Sodium Bicarbonate versus Urokinase in Management of Complicated Pleural Effusion: A Comparative Cohort Study.

Niveen E Zayed, Karim El Fakharany, Mohammed Mehriz Naguib Abozaid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Local management of pleural infection: a narrative review.European journal of medical research · 2026
    Review
  2. What is new in pleural infections?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niveen E ZayedDepartment of Chest Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig City, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9542-1275
Karim El FakharanyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig City, Egypt.
Mohammed Mehriz Naguib AbozaidDepartment of Chest Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig City, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9812-7389
Zagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The main target is evacuation; however, with evidence about the value of intrapleural instillation of different fibrinolytic agents still under evaluation, our aim was comparing the effectiveness and safety of intrapleural instillation of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO Methods: Our prospective cohort study included 40 patients with complicated empyema; the diagnosis was based on analysis of aspirated fluid in association with radiological and bacteriological culture. The patients were subjected to instillation of two different fibrinolytic agents; the first one was NaHCO Results: The commonest underlying chest infection that was visualized by CT was pneumonia 70%. Nearly half of cases had community-acquired infection (45%), and more than half of them (55%) had anaerobic infection, and only five cases had TB pleural effusion based on ADA-positive, tuberculin skin test in addition to Abram's needles closed biopsy. The rate of repeated therapeutic thoracentesis success in each group was 85%; 80% in NaHCO Conclusion: The efficacy of repeated therapeutic thoracentesis (RTT) with intrapleural instillation of NaHCO

Indexed as

fibrinolytic agentsNaHCO3pleural infectionurokinase

Identifiers

PMID36575733
PMCPMC9790168
OpenAlexW4313213459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.