Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575665›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2022

Capecitabine and Temozolomide (CAPTEM) in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs): A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Giulia Arrivi, Monica Verrico, Michela Roberto, Giacomo Barchiesi, Antongiulio Faggiano, Paolo Marchetti, Federica Mazzuca, Silverio Tomao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia ArriviDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Monica VerricoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Michela RobertoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo BarchiesiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antongiulio FaggianoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Endocrinology Unit, Sant 'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Federica Mazzuca *Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Silverio Tomao *Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITIstituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Retrospective studies and single center experiences suggest a role of capecitabine combined with temozolomide (CAPTEM) in neuroendocrine tumors (NENs). Methods: We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of CAPTEM in patients affected with NENs, with the aim to better clarify the role of this regimen in the therapeutic algorithm of NENs. Results: A total of 42 articles and 1818 patients were included in our review. The overall disease control rate was 77% (range 43.5%-100%). The median progression free survival ranged from 4 to 38.5 months, while the median overall survival ranged from 8 to 103 months. Safety analysis showed an occurrence of G3-G4 toxicities in 16.4% of the entire population. The most common toxicities were hematological (27.2%), gastrointestinal (8.3%,) and cutaneous (3.2%). Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that CAPTEM was an effective and relatively safe treatment for patients with advanced well-moderate differentiated NENs of gastroenteropancreatic, lung and unknown origin.

Indexed as

capecitabineCAPTEMchemotherapyNENsneuroendocrinetemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID36575665
PMCPMC9790144
OpenAlexW4311976938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.