Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575664›Full record

ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2022

A flexible neural implant with ultrathin substrate for low-invasive brain-computer interface applications.

Zhejun Guo, Fang Wang, Longchun Wang, Kejun Tu, Chunpeng Jiang, Ye Xi, Wen Hong, Qingda Xu, Xiaolin Wang, Bin Yang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Autonomous Implants.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Ultraflexible PEDOT:PSS/IrOMicromachines · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhejun GuoNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025 Shanghai, China.
Longchun WangNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Kejun TuNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Chunpeng JiangNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Ye XiNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Wen HongNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Qingda XuNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Xiaolin WangNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Bin YangNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Bomin SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025 Shanghai, China.
Zude LinNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.
Jingquan LiuNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4140-1516
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable brain-computer interface (BCI) devices are an effective tool to decipher fundamental brain mechanisms and treat neural diseases. However, traditional neural implants with rigid or bulky cross-sections cause trauma and decrease the quality of the neuronal signal. Here, we propose a MEMS-fabricated flexible interface device for BCI applications. The microdevice with a thin film substrate can be readily reduced to submicron scale for low-invasive implantation. An elaborate silicon shuttle with an improved structure is designed to reliably implant the flexible device into brain tissue. The flexible substrate is temporarily bonded to the silicon shuttle by polyethylene glycol. On the flexible substrate, eight electrodes with different diameters are distributed evenly for local field potential and neural spike recording, both of which are modified by Pt-black to enhance the charge storage capacity and reduce the impedance. The mechanical and electrochemical characteristics of this interface were investigated in vitro. In vivo, the small cross-section of the device promises reduced trauma, and the neuronal signals can still be recorded one month after implantation, demonstrating the promise of this kind of flexible BCI device as a low-invasive tool for brain-computer communication.

Indexed as

NanobiotechnologySensors

Identifiers

PMID36575664
PMCPMC9789992
OpenAlexW4312130751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.