Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575635›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

A Review of the Ethical Use of Animals in Functional Experimental Research in China Based on the "Four R" Principles of Reduction, Replacement, Refinement, and Responsibility.

Meili Kang, Tianlin Long, Cuicui Chang, Ting Meng, Huaifen Ma, Zemeng Li, Ping Li, Yuhua Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Survey Results on the Awareness of Laboratory Animal Welfare among Medical Graduate Students.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meili KangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Xi'an Peihua University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Tianlin LongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bijie Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Bijie, Guizhou, China (mainland).
Cuicui ChangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Xi'an Peihua University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Ting MengDepartment of Central Laboratory, Xi'an Peihua University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Huaifen MaDepartment of Central Laboratory, Xi'an Peihua University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Zemeng LiDepartment of Central Laboratory, Xi'an Peihua University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Ping LiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Bijie Medical College, Bijie, Guizhou, China (mainland).
Yuhua ChenDepartment of Central Laboratory, Xi'an Peihua University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of live laboratory animals is essential in the process of functional experimentation teaching. There are ethical problems, such as poor experimental environment, non-standard operation, and neglect of animal rights in experimental teaching. As an important basic course in life science education, functional experimentation should establish the correct ethics of use of laboratory animals. The welfare of laboratory animals has become one of the frontier directions of medical ethics research. The "4R" principle of animal welfare is based on the principles of reduction, replacement, refinement, and responsibility, which may provide a way to solve ethical problems in the teaching and research activities of functional experimentation. In addition to receiving relevant knowledge and education, laboratory animal practitioners and students in functional experimentation teaching should consciously abide by relevant regulations and rules and actively follow the "4R" principles. Animal ethics education is reflected in all teaching and research activities. Based on the principle of "4R" and the premise of guaranteeing teaching objectives, virtual simulation experiment teaching is a great supplement to functional experimentation. In teaching, medical ethics education should be strengthened to cultivate the consciousness of respecting the life of experimental animals, and awareness of laboratory animal ethics should be improved among teachers and students of functional experimentation to further promote ideological and political education in colleges and universities. This brief summary analyzes the general situation of animal ethics in functional experimentation in China based on the principle of "4R" and provides certain references and support for course teaching and training.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAnimal RightsAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryAnimal WelfareHumansStudents

Identifiers

PMID36575635
PMCPMC9806933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.