Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575566›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023

Improving artificial intelligence pipeline for liver malignancy diagnosis using ultrasound images and video frames.

Yiming Xu, Bowen Zheng, Xiaohong Liu, Tao Wu, Jinxiu Ju, Shijie Wang, Yufan Lian, Hongjun Zhang, Tong Liang, Ye Sang and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Whole-lesion-aware network based on freehand ultrasound video for breast cancer assessment: a prospective multicenter study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yiming XuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology & Institute of Artificial Intelligence & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7871-8483
Bowen ZhengThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaohong LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology & Institute of Artificial Intelligence & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Tao WuThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jinxiu JuThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shijie WangThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yufan LianThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hongjun ZhangThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Tong LiangFoshan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Ye SangThe First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang 443003, China.
Rui JiangDepartment of Automation & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Guangyu WangSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Jie RenThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ting ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Technology & Institute of Artificial Intelligence & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNTsinghua University · CNBeijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · CNChina Three Gorges University · CNFoshan Hospital of TCM · CN

Funding

Guoqiang Institute of Tsinghua UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China 61906105Tsinghua-Qingdao Institute of Data Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments of deep learning methods have demonstrated their feasibility in liver malignancy diagnosis using ultrasound (US) images. However, most of these methods require manual selection and annotation of US images by radiologists, which limit their practical application. On the other hand, US videos provide more comprehensive morphological information about liver masses and their relationships with surrounding structures than US images, potentially leading to a more accurate diagnosis. Here, we developed a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline to imitate the workflow of radiologists for detecting liver masses and diagnosing liver malignancy. In this pipeline, we designed an automated mass-guided strategy that used segmentation information to direct diagnostic models to focus on liver masses, thus increasing diagnostic accuracy. The diagnostic models based on US videos utilized bi-directional convolutional long short-term memory modules with an attention-boosted module to learn and fuse spatiotemporal information from consecutive video frames. Using a large-scale dataset of 50 063 US images and video frames from 11 468 patients, we developed and tested the AI pipeline and investigated its applications. A dataset of annotated US images is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7272660.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLiver NeoplasmsHumansWorkflowartificial intelligencedeep learningliver malignancy diagnosisultrasound images

Identifiers

PMID36575566
PMCPMC10390801
OpenAlexW4313236928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.