ReviewJournal of biological engineering2022
High throughput mutagenesis and screening for yeast engineering.
Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced production of l-histidine inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- High-throughput yeast engineering in biofoundries: towards autonomous and scalable synthetic biology.FEMS yeast research · 2026Review
- Article
- Sensitive, high-throughput, metabolic analysis by molecular sensors on the membrane surface of mother yeast cells.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Whole genome analysis of Stenotrophomonas geniculata MK2 and antagonism against Botrytis cinerea in strawberry.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the new chapter in nanobody engineering: advances in traditional construction and AI-driven optimization.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Advances in CRISPR-enabled genome-wide screens in yeast.FEMS yeast research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The eukaryotic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a model host utilized for whole cell biocatalytic conversions, protein evolution, and scientific inquiries into the pathogenesis of human disease. Over the past decade, the scale and pace of such studies has drastically increased alongside the advent of novel tools for both genome-wide studies and targeted genetic mutagenesis. In this review, we will detail past and present (e.g., CRISPR/Cas) genome-scale screening platforms, typically employed in the context of growth-based selections for improved whole cell phenotype or for mechanistic interrogations. We will further highlight recent advances that enable the rapid and often continuous evolution of biomolecules with improved function. Additionally, we will detail the corresponding advances in high throughput selection and screening strategies that are essential for assessing or isolating cellular and protein improvements. Finally, we will describe how future developments can continue to advance yeast high throughput engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.