Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575519›Full record

ReviewRespiratory research2022

Thoracic surgery in the non-intubated spontaneously breathing patient.

Matthias Grott, Martin Eichhorn, Florian Eichhorn, Werner Schmidt, Michael Kreuter, Hauke Winter

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Clinical Use of Endotracheal Intubation Without Neuromuscular Blockade: The Current Stage of Knowledge.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Physiological pattern differences in non-intubatedJournal of thoracic disease · 2025
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias GrottDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin EichhornDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian EichhornDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Werner SchmidtDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael KreuterTranslational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hauke WinterDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany. hauke.winter@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEGerman Center for Lung Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe interest in non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS) has risen over the last decade and numerous terms have been used to describe this technique. They all have in common, that the surgical procedure is performed in a spontaneously breathing patient under locoregional anaesthesia in combination with intravenous sedation but have also been performed on awake patients without sedation. Evidence has been generated favouring NIVATS compared to one-lung-ventilation under general anaesthesia. MAIN BODY: We want to give an overview of how NIVATS is performed, and which different techniques are possible. We discuss advantages such as shorter length of hospital stay or (relative) contraindications like airway difficulties. Technical aspects, for instance intraoperative handling of the vagus nerve, are considered from a thoracic surgeon's point of view. Furthermore, special attention is paid to the cohort of patients with interstitial lung diseases, who seem to benefit from NIVATS due to the avoidance of positive pressure ventilation. Whenever a new technique is introduced, it must prove noninferiority to the state of the art. Under this aspect current literature on NIVATS for lung cancer surgery has been reviewed.

conclusionNIVATS technique may safely be applied to minor, moderate, and major thoracic procedures and is appropriate for a selected group of patients, especially in interstitial lung disease. However, prospective studies are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Thoracic SurgeryHumansLength of StayProspective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedInterstitial lung diseaseLung cancerNon-intubated video assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36575519
PMCPMC9793515
OpenAlexW4313249957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.