Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575442›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Detecting subtle signs of depression with automated speech analysis in a non-clinical sample.

Alexandra König, Johannes Tröger, Elisa Mallick, Mario Mina, Nicklas Linz, Carole Wagnon, Julia Karbach, Caroline Kuhn, Jessica Peter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandra KönigInstitut National de Recherche en Informatique Et en Automatique (INRIA), Sophia Antipolis, Stars Team, Valbonne, France.
Johannes TrögerKi Elements, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Elisa MallickKi Elements, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Mario MinaKi Elements, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Nicklas LinzKi Elements, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Carole WagnonUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, CH-3000, Bern 60, Switzerland.
Julia KarbachDepartment of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz, Germany.
Caroline KuhnDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Jessica PeterUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, CH-3000, Bern 60, Switzerland. Jessica.peter@upd.unibe.ch.
University of Bern · CHInstitut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique · FRSaarland University · DEUniversity of Koblenz and Landau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomated speech analysis has gained increasing attention to help diagnosing depression. Most previous studies, however, focused on comparing speech in patients with major depressive disorder to that in healthy volunteers. An alternative may be to associate speech with depressive symptoms in a non-clinical sample as this may help to find early and sensitive markers in those at risk of depression.

methodsWe included n = 118 healthy young adults (mean age: 23.5 ± 3.7 years; 77% women) and asked them to talk about a positive and a negative event in their life. Then, we assessed the level of depressive symptoms with a self-report questionnaire, with scores ranging from 0-60. We transcribed speech data and extracted acoustic as well as linguistic features. Then, we tested whether individuals below or above the cut-off of clinically relevant depressive symptoms differed in speech features. Next, we predicted whether someone would be below or above that cut-off as well as the individual scores on the depression questionnaire. Since depression is associated with cognitive slowing or attentional deficits, we finally correlated depression scores with performance in the Trail Making Test.

resultsIn our sample, n = 93 individuals scored below and n = 25 scored above cut-off for clinically relevant depressive symptoms. Most speech features did not differ significantly between both groups, but individuals above cut-off spoke more than those below that cut-off in the positive and the negative story. In addition, higher depression scores in that group were associated with slower completion time of the Trail Making Test. We were able to predict with 93% accuracy who would be below or above cut-off. In addition, we were able to predict the individual depression scores with low mean absolute error (3.90), with best performance achieved by a support vector machine.

conclusionsOur results indicate that even in a sample without a clinical diagnosis of depression, changes in speech relate to higher depression scores. This should be investigated in more detail in the future. In a longitudinal study, it may be tested whether speech features found in our study represent early and sensitive markers for subsequent depression in individuals at risk.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAdultDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSpeechSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAcoustic featuresAutomated speech analysisDepressive symptomsMachine learningTextual features

Identifiers

PMID36575442
PMCPMC9793349
OpenAlexW4312201997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.