Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575434›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2022

Importance of physician history taking in complementing patient-reported interstitial lung disease questionnaire.

Tal Moshe Perluk, Inbal Friedman Regev, Ophir Freund, Eyal Kleinhendler, Tzlil Hershko, Sharona Ben-Ami, Amir Bar-Shai, Avraham Unterman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tal Moshe PerlukInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Inbal Friedman RegevInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ophir FreundInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eyal KleinhendlerInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tzlil HershkoInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sharona Ben-AmiInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amir Bar-ShaiInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Avraham UntermanInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. ramiu@tlvmc.gov.il.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported interstitial lung disease (ILD) questionnaires are commonly used for the evaluation of ILD patients. However, research to test their performance is scarce.

methodsThis study aimed to assess the performance of the Chest Questionnaire in consecutive ILD patients presenting to a tertiary ILD center. The results of Chest Questionnaires routinely filled by patients were analyzed together with clinical and demographic data retrieved from the patients' medical records. The ability of each questionnaire item to detect positive findings, such as environmental and occupational exposures, was examined relative to any additional findings detected by physician-acquired history. History was obtained by an experienced ILD pulmonologist who had access to the results of the questionnaire during the clinic visit.

resultsThe final cohort for analysis included 62 patients. Shortness of breath frequency and duration were the questionnaire items with the lowest probability of being filled out by patients. The questionnaire performed well in identifying 96.2% of patients with a positive family history and 90.9% of patients with occupational exposures. However, exposures to mold or birds were frequently missed, self-reported by only 53.1% of exposed patients. Questionnaire's performance was also lower for other exposures associated with ILD (48.3%). An ILD-related exposure was less likely to be identified by the questionnaire in males (p = 0.03), while age had no such effect.

conclusionsThe Chest Questionnaire performed well in several domains, while failing to detect some relevant exposures. Therefore, its use should be accompanied by careful history taking by the physician.

Indexed as

Lung Diseases, InterstitialPhysiciansHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and QuestionnairesThoraxChest questionnaireDiagnosticsInterstitial lung diseasePulmonary fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID36575434
PMCPMC9793812
OpenAlexW4313250592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.