Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575413›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2022

Gut microbe Lactiplantibacillus plantarum undergoes different evolutionary trajectories between insects and mammals.

Elisa Maritan, Marialaura Gallo, Dagmar Srutkova, Anna Jelinkova, Oldrich Benada, Olga Kofronova, Nuno F Silva-Soares, Tomas Hudcovic, Isaac Gifford, Jeffrey E Barrick and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elisa MaritanDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Marialaura GalloDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Dagmar SrutkovaLaboratory of Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novy Hradek, Czech Republic.
Anna JelinkovaLaboratory of Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novy Hradek, Czech Republic.
Oldrich BenadaLaboratory of Molecular Structure Characterization, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Olga KofronovaLaboratory of Molecular Structure Characterization, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nuno F Silva-SoaresDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Tomas HudcovicLaboratory of Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novy Hradek, Czech Republic.
Isaac GiffordDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Jeffrey E BarrickDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Martin SchwarzerLaboratory of Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novy Hradek, Czech Republic. schwarzer@biomed.cas.cz.
Maria Elena MartinoDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. mariaelena.martino@unipd.it.

Funding

Army Research Office W911NF-20-1-0195Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy 4139National Science Foundation DEB-1813069Welch Foundation F-1979-20190330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimals form complex symbiotic associations with their gut microbes, whose evolution is determined by an intricate network of host and environmental factors. In many insects, such as Drosophila melanogaster, the microbiome is flexible, environmentally determined, and less diverse than in mammals. In contrast, mammals maintain complex multispecies consortia that are able to colonize and persist in the gastrointestinal tract. Understanding the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of gut microbes in different hosts is challenging. This requires disentangling the ecological factors of selection, determining the timescales over which evolution occurs, and elucidating the architecture of such evolutionary patterns.

resultsWe employ experimental evolution to track the pace of the evolution of a common gut commensal, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, within invertebrate (Drosophila melanogaster) and vertebrate (Mus musculus) hosts and their respective diets. We show that in Drosophila, the nutritional environment dictates microbial evolution, while the host benefits L. plantarum growth only over short ecological timescales. By contrast, in a mammalian animal model, L. plantarum evolution results to be divergent between the host intestine and its diet, both phenotypically (i.e., host-evolved populations show higher adaptation to the host intestinal environment) and genomically. Here, both the emergence of hypermutators and the high persistence of mutated genes within the host's environment strongly differed from the low variation observed in the host's nutritional environment alone.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that L. plantarum evolution diverges between insects and mammals. While the symbiosis between Drosophila and L. plantarum is mainly determined by the host diet, in mammals, the host and its intrinsic factors play a critical role in selection and influence both the phenotypic and genomic evolution of its gut microbes, as well as the outcome of their symbiosis.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterMammalsMiceSymbiosisDrosophila melanogasterExperimental evolutionGut microbiota evolutionHost–microbe symbiosisLactiplantibacillus plantarumMouseWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36575413
PMCPMC9795633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.