Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575380›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2022

Objective hearing threshold identification from auditory brainstem response measurements using supervised and self-supervised approaches.

Dominik Thalmeier, Gregor Miller, Elida Schneltzer, Anja Hurt, Martin Hrabě deAngelis, Lore Becker, Christian L Müller, Holger Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominik Thalmeier *Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany.
Gregor Miller *Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany.
Elida SchneltzerInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany.
Anja HurtInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany.
Martin Hrabě deAngelisInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany. hrabe@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Lore BeckerInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany.
Christian L MüllerInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany. christian.mueller@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Holger MaierInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany.

Funding

Helmholtz Association’s Initiative and Networking Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss is a major health problem and psychological burden in humans. Mouse models offer a possibility to elucidate genes involved in the underlying developmental and pathophysiological mechanisms of hearing impairment. To this end, large-scale mouse phenotyping programs include auditory phenotyping of single-gene knockout mouse lines. Using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) procedure, the German Mouse Clinic and similar facilities worldwide have produced large, uniform data sets of averaged ABR raw data of mutant and wildtype mice. In the course of standard ABR analysis, hearing thresholds are assessed visually by trained staff from series of signal curves of increasing sound pressure level. This is time-consuming and prone to be biased by the reader as well as the graphical display quality and scale.In an attempt to reduce workload and improve quality and reproducibility, we developed and compared two methods for automated hearing threshold identification from averaged ABR raw data: a supervised approach involving two combined neural networks trained on human-generated labels and a self-supervised approach, which exploits the signal power spectrum and combines random forest sound level estimation with a piece-wise curve fitting algorithm for threshold finding.We show that both models work well and are suitable for fast, reliable, and unbiased hearing threshold detection and quality control. In a high-throughput mouse phenotyping environment, both methods perform well as part of an automated end-to-end screening pipeline to detect candidate genes for hearing involvement. Code for both models as well as data used for this work are freely available.

Indexed as

DeafnessEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory ThresholdHearingHumansMiceReproducibility of ResultsAuditory brainstem responseAutomationEvoked potentialsHigh-throughput hearing screeningObjective hearing threshold detection

Identifiers

PMID36575380
PMCPMC9795643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.