Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575327›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2023

fMRIflows: A Consortium of Fully Automatic Univariate and Multivariate fMRI Processing Pipelines.

Michael P Notter, Peer Herholz, Sandra Da Costa, Omer F Gulban, Ayse Ilkay Isik, Anna Gaglianese, Micah M Murray

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael P Notter *The Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. michaelnotter@hotmail.com.
Peer Herholz *International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research, Université de Montréal & McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Sandra Da CostaCIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Omer F GulbanDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ayse Ilkay IsikDepartment of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anna GaglianeseThe Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Micah M MurrayThe Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. micah.murray@chuv.ch.

Funding

Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI David Nelson Kennedy · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
Large-scale meta-analysis of functional MRI dataR01MH096906 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alejandro De La Vega · 2012 to 2026
$7.9M
European Research Council DVL-894612NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096906Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 169206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are analyzed depends on the researcher and the toolbox used. It is not uncommon that the processing pipeline is rewritten for each new dataset. Consequently, code transparency, quality control and objective analysis pipelines are important for improving reproducibility in neuroimaging studies. Toolboxes, such as Nipype and fMRIPrep, have documented the need for and interest in automated pre-processing analysis pipelines. Recent developments in data-driven models combined with high resolution neuroimaging dataset have strengthened the need not only for a standardized preprocessing workflow, but also for a reliable and comparable statistical pipeline. Here, we introduce fMRIflows: a consortium of fully automatic neuroimaging pipelines for fMRI analysis, which performs standard preprocessing, as well as 1st- and 2nd-level univariate and multivariate analyses. In addition to the standardized pre-processing pipelines, fMRIflows provides flexible temporal and spatial filtering to account for datasets with increasingly high temporal resolution and to help appropriately prepare data for advanced machine learning analyses, improving signal decoding accuracy and reliability. This paper first describes fMRIflows' structure and functionality, then explains its infrastructure and access, and lastly validates the toolbox by comparing it to other neuroimaging processing pipelines such as fMRIPrep, FSL and SPM. This validation was performed on three datasets with varying temporal sampling and acquisition parameters to prove its flexibility and robustness. fMRIflows is a fully automatic fMRI processing pipeline which uniquely offers univariate and multivariate single-subject and group analyses as well as pre-processing.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSoftwareBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingReproducibility of ResultsData processingNeuroimagingPipelinePythonReproducible research

Identifiers

PMID36575327
PMCPMC10014671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.