Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575175›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2022

Clinical recommendations for dry powder inhaler use in the management of COPD in primary care.

Marika T Leving, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich, Joyce van Cooten, Jaime Correia de Sousa, Biljana Cvetkovski, Richard Dekhuijzen, Lars Dijk, Marina Garcia Pardo, Asparuh Gardev, Radosław Gawlik and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04532853 (Optimizing Maintenance Therapy in COPD Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04532853 completednot on this map

Optimizing Maintenance Therapy in COPD Patients: Real-world Observational Study of Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate, Inhalation Technique, and Medication Adherence

TypeobservationalSponsorGeneral Practitioners Research InstituteRan2020 to 2021Enrolled1,434ConditionsCOPD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Marika T LevingGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-4406
Sinthia Bosnic-AnticevichWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5077-8329
Joyce van CootenGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jaime Correia de SousaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), PT Government Associate Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-7908
Biljana CvetkovskiWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2297-8141
Richard DekhuijzenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Lars DijkGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9544-1487
Marina Garcia PardoPrimary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4183-8219
Asparuh GardevBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Radosław GawlikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Iris van der HamGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ymke JanseGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Federico LavoriniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3293-2123
Tiago MaricotoFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4201-9565
Jiska MeijerGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Boyd MetzGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
David PriceObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-9992
Miguel Roman-RodriguezPrimary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Kirsten SchuttelGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nilouq StokerGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0023-6529
Ioanna TsiligianniDepartment of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece.
Omar UsmaniAirway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Rachel Emerson-StadlerBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Janwillem W H KocksGeneral Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands. janwillem@gpri.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2760-0693
General Practitioners Research Institute · NLBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESThe University of Sydney · AUAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITMedical University of Silesia · PLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Beira Interior · PTUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 1400 patients using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to deliver COPD maintenance therapies were recruited across Europe and Australia. Their peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was measured, inhaler technique was observed, and adherence to treatment assessed. From relating the findings with patient health status, and thereby identifying critical errors, key clinical recommendations for primary care clinicians were determined, namely - measure PIF before prescribing a DPI to ensure inhalation manoeuvre ability is well-matched with the device. Some patients could benefit from inhalation training whereas others should have their DPI changed for one better suited to their inspiratory ability or alternatively be prescribed an active device (such as a soft mist inhaler or pressurized metered dose inhaler). Observing the inhalation technique was valuable however this misses suboptimal PIF (approaching one fourth of patients with a satisfactory observed manoeuvre had a suboptimal PIF for their DPI). Assess adherence as deliberate non-adherence can point to a mismatch between a patient and their inhaler (deliberate non-adherence was significantly associated with PIFs below the minimum for the DPI). In-person observation of inhalation technique was found to be inferior to video rating based on device-specific checklists. Where video assessments are not possible, observation training for healthcare professionals would therefore be valuable particularly to improve the ability to identify the critical errors associated with health status namely 'teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece', 'breathe in' and 'breathing out calmly after inhalation'. However, it is recommended that observation alone should not replace PIF measurement in the DPI selection process.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 .

Indexed as

Dry Powder InhalersPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationHumansMetered Dose InhalersPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID36575175
PMCPMC9794707
OpenAlexW4313252100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.