ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2022
Clinical recommendations for dry powder inhaler use in the management of COPD in primary care.
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04532853 (Optimizing Maintenance Therapy in COPD Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimizing Maintenance Therapy in COPD Patients: Real-world Observational Study of Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate, Inhalation Technique, and Medication Adherence
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary care general practitioners regarding COPD inhaler education: a cross-sectional study in Yiwu, China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Advancing pulmonary therapy: the role of dry powder inhalation technology in lung disease management.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Assessment of peak inspiratory flow in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicentre, observational, prospective, real-life study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Observational
- Comparative In Vitro Deposition Analysis of Formoterol, Glycopyrronium, and Tiotropium Delivered via Capsule-Based DPI.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Development of a Scoring System to Predict Suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Observational
- Inhalation treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in older patients.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of an educational intervention on different types of errors -occurring during inhaler therapy use in COPD patients during a -Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Downstream Effects of Market Changes on Inhalers: Impacts on Individuals With Chronic Lung Disease.Respiratory care · 2024Review
- Aerosol Plumes of Inhalers Used in COPD.Pulmonary therapy · 2024Article
- Personalizing Selection of Inhaled Delivery Systems in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Review
- Identifying critical inhalation technique errors in Dry Powder Inhaler use in patients with COPD based on the association with health status and exacerbations: findings from the multi-country cross-sectional observational PIFotal study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Observational
- Factors influencing patient-provider communication about subjective cognitive decline in people with COPD: Insights from a national survey.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over 1400 patients using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to deliver COPD maintenance therapies were recruited across Europe and Australia. Their peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was measured, inhaler technique was observed, and adherence to treatment assessed. From relating the findings with patient health status, and thereby identifying critical errors, key clinical recommendations for primary care clinicians were determined, namely - measure PIF before prescribing a DPI to ensure inhalation manoeuvre ability is well-matched with the device. Some patients could benefit from inhalation training whereas others should have their DPI changed for one better suited to their inspiratory ability or alternatively be prescribed an active device (such as a soft mist inhaler or pressurized metered dose inhaler). Observing the inhalation technique was valuable however this misses suboptimal PIF (approaching one fourth of patients with a satisfactory observed manoeuvre had a suboptimal PIF for their DPI). Assess adherence as deliberate non-adherence can point to a mismatch between a patient and their inhaler (deliberate non-adherence was significantly associated with PIFs below the minimum for the DPI). In-person observation of inhalation technique was found to be inferior to video rating based on device-specific checklists. Where video assessments are not possible, observation training for healthcare professionals would therefore be valuable particularly to improve the ability to identify the critical errors associated with health status namely 'teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece', 'breathe in' and 'breathing out calmly after inhalation'. However, it is recommended that observation alone should not replace PIF measurement in the DPI selection process.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.