Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575161›Full record

ArticleCell discovery2022

Dissecting the fate of Foxl2-expressing cells in fetal ovary using lineage tracing and single-cell transcriptomics.

Jingjing Zhou, Xiangxiang Jiang, Haowei Wu, Lianjun Zhang, Min Chen, Min Chen, Zhiming Shen, Xudong Guo, Hongmei Wang, Fei Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conservation and contrast in cell states of echinoderm ovaries.Molecular reproduction and development · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current progress onFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jingjing Zhou *State Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiangxiang Jiang *State Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0104-3718
Haowei Wu *State Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lianjun ZhangState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Min ChenState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Min ChenState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhiming ShenState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xudong GuoState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation & Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China. bixdguo@imu.edu.cn.
Hongmei WangState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. wanghm@ioz.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-4785
Fei GaoState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. gaof@ioz.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNAnhui Medical University · CNCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USInner Mongolia University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31671496National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31970785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gonad somatic cells acquire sex-specific fates during sex determination. In XX gonad, a subset of somatic cells expresses Foxl2 after sex determination which is considered the progenitor of granulosa cells. However, whether these cells also contribute to other cell types at later developmental stages is unknown. In the present study, the cell fate of Foxl2-expressing cells in fetal ovaries was analyzed by lineage tracing and single-cell transcriptomics. We found that Foxl2-expressing cells gave rise to three cell types at later developmental stages, including granulosa cells, theca-interstitial cells, and stromal cells. Series single-cell RNA sequencing revealed FOXL2-positive cells were divided into two clusters at P0. One group further differentiated into granulosa cells and Theca-G (Theca-interstitial cells derived from granulosa) at P14. Another group was classified as stromal cell lineage, then a small portion of them further differentiated into 3β-HSD-positive Theca-S (Theca-interstitial cells derived from stroma). Cyp17a1 was expressed in Theca-S, but not in Theca-G. This study demonstrated that Folx2-expressing cells in XX gonad after sex determination are multipotent and theca-interstitial cells are derived from different progenitors. Our data provided an important resource, at single-cell resolution, for a better understanding of somatic cell differentiation in ovary development.

Identifiers

PMID36575161
PMCPMC9794781
OpenAlexW4313251798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.