Trial reportInternational wound journal2023
Within-patient randomised clinical trial exploring the development of microskin implantation in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Within-patient randomised clinical trial exploring the development of microskin implantation in the treatment of pressure ulcers.International wound journal · 2023Trial
- A Novel Randomized Trial Protocol for Evaluating Wound Healing Interventions.Advances in wound care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Pressure injury often seriously affects the life quality of aged patients, especially the long-term bedridden casualties. Widely adopted by different disciplines, negative pressure suction has its role in pressure injury. Microskin implantation has been demonstrated powerful in increasing the expansion ratio of donor area-derived skin and accelerating wound healing by forming "skin islands". The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional use of bedside microskin implantation in the palliative care of pressure injury of aged patients who cannot tolerate surgical treatment as a supplement for standard negative pressure suction. An open-label within-patient RCT was conducted in aged patients with pressure injury. Sixteen patients were enrolled. After granulation tissues formed, half of a pressure injury was randomised to receive the negative pressure suction as the control group, and the other half exposed to additional bedside microskin implantation as the experimental group. Efficacy was evaluated within 1 month after treatment, and the primary endpoints included the wound healing rate and pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH) scores. The secondary outcomes included survival rate of implanted microskin, pain intensity assessment, satisfaction surveys from patients or their family, and pressure ulcer healing complications. Sixteen patients completed the study. After 14 days of operation, 5.63 ± 1.78 out of 10 pieces of implanted microskin survived and formed neonatal epithelium. The wound healing rates of the control group and the experimental group at 1 month were (26.17 ± 9.03%) and (35.95 ± 16.02%), respectively (P < .01). The mean PUSH score before the surgery was 12.38 ± 2.23. At 1 month after surgery, the mean difference of PUSH score from baseline was 2.13 ± 0.96 in the control group and 2.81 ± 0.83 in the experimental group (P < .01). The treatment of microskin implantation did not cause additional pain or complications to the patients. Accompanied by a better ulcer status, the majority of patients or their guardians have a high degree of acceptance towards the microskin implantation. Bedside microskin implantation could accelerate wound healing with lower PUSH scores. As a complementary palliative treatment, supplementary microskin implantation is effective and well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.