Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36574957›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2023

Graph lesion-deficit mapping of fluid intelligence.

Lisa Cipolotti, James K Ruffle, Joe Mole, Tianbo Xu, Harpreet Hyare, Tim Shallice, Edgar Chan, Parashkev Nachev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive control & the anterior cingulate cortex: Necessity & coherence.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Brain tumour genetic network signatures of survival.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa CipolottiDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-3647
James K RuffleInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-7203
Joe MoleDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0092-1128
Tianbo XuInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Harpreet HyareInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4672-3349
Tim ShalliceInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK.
Edgar ChanDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Parashkev NachevInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-4423

Funding

Department of Health's National InstituteGuarantors of BrainHealth Research Biomedical Research Centre'sNational Brain AppealWelcome Trust 089231/A/09/ZWellcome Trust 213038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid intelligence is arguably the defining feature of human cognition. Yet the nature of its relationship with the brain remains a contentious topic. Influential proposals drawing primarily on functional imaging data have implicated 'multiple demand' frontoparietal and more widely distributed cortical networks, but extant lesion-deficit studies with greater causal power are almost all small, methodologically constrained, and inconclusive. The task demands large samples of patients, comprehensive investigation of performance, fine-grained anatomical mapping, and robust lesion-deficit inference, yet to be brought to bear on it. We assessed 165 healthy controls and 227 frontal or non-frontal patients with unilateral brain lesions on the best-established test of fluid intelligence, Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices, employing an array of lesion-deficit inferential models responsive to the potentially distributed nature of fluid intelligence. Non-parametric Bayesian stochastic block models were used to reveal the community structure of lesion deficit networks, disentangling functional from confounding pathological distributed effects. Impaired performance was confined to patients with frontal lesions [F(2,387) = 18.491; P < 0.001; frontal worse than non-frontal and healthy participants P < 0.01, P <0.001], more marked on the right than left [F(4,385) = 12.237; P < 0.001; right worse than left and healthy participants P < 0.01, P < 0.001]. Patients with non-frontal lesions were indistinguishable from controls and showed no modulation by laterality. Neither the presence nor the extent of multiple demand network involvement affected performance. Both conventional network-based statistics and non-parametric Bayesian stochastic block modelling heavily implicated the right frontal lobe. Crucially, this localization was confirmed on explicitly disentangling functional from pathology-driven effects within a layered stochastic block model, prominently highlighting a right frontal network involving middle and inferior frontal gyrus, pre- and post-central gyri, with a weak contribution from right superior parietal lobule. Similar results were obtained with standard lesion-deficit analyses. Our study represents the first large-scale investigation of the distributed neural substrates of fluid intelligence in the focally injured brain. Combining novel graph-based lesion-deficit mapping with detailed investigation of cognitive performance in a large sample of patients provides crucial information about the neural basis of intelligence. Our findings indicate that a set of predominantly right frontal regions, rather than a more widely distributed network, is critical to the high-level functions involved in fluid intelligence. Further they suggest that Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices is a useful clinical index of fluid intelligence and a sensitive marker of right frontal lobe dysfunction.

Indexed as

BrainIntelligenceBayes TheoremBrain MappingCognitionFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal Cortexexecutive functionsfluencyfocal lesionfrontal lobeslesion-symptom mapping

Identifiers

PMID36574957
PMCPMC9825598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.