Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36574947›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2023

Genomes of the cosmopolitan fruit pest Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) reveal its global invasion history and thermal adaptation.

Yue Zhang, Shanlin Liu, Marc De Meyer, Zuxing Liao, Yan Zhao, Massimiliano Virgilio, Shiqian Feng, Yujia Qin, Sandeep Singh, Suk Ling Wee and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Yue ZhangCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
Shanlin LiuCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Marc De MeyerRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren B3080, Belgium.
Zuxing LiaoCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
Yan ZhaoCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
Massimiliano VirgilioRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren B3080, Belgium.
Shiqian FengCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
Yujia QinCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
Sandeep SinghDepartment of Fruit Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Suk Ling WeeCentre for Insect Systematics, Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Fan JiangInstitute of Plant Quarantine, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, Beijing 100176, China.
Shaokun GuoCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
Hu LiCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Pablo DeschepperRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren B3080, Belgium.
Sam VanbergenRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren B3080, Belgium.
Hélène DelatteCIRAD UMR PVBMT, Ambatobe, Madagascar.
Alies van Sauers-MullerMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Paramaribo, Suriname.
Tati Suryati SyamsudinSchool of Life Science and Technology, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia.
Anastasia Priscilla KawiNational Agriculture Quarantine & Inspection Authority, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Muo KasinaApiculture Research Institute, P.O. Box 32-40302, Marigat, Kenya.
Kemo BadjiCrop Protection Directorate, Dakar, Senegal.
Fazal SaidDepartment of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Mardan, Pakistan.
Lijun LiuCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
Zihua ZhaoCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
Zhihong LiCollege of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: lizh@cau.edu.cn.
China Agricultural University · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNRoyal Museum for Central Africa · BEAbdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PKBandung Institute of Technology · IDChinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine · CNKenya Agricultural Research Institute · KEMinistère de la Santé · LUNational Department of Health · PGNational University of Malaysia · MYPunjab Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis is one of the most destructive agricultural pests worldwide, with highly debated species delimitation, origin, and global spread routes.

objectivesOur study intended to (i) resolve the taxonomic uncertainties between B. dorsalis and B. carambolae, (ii) reveal the population structure and global invasion routes of B. dorsalis across Asia, Africa, and Oceania, and (iii) identify genomic regions that are responsible for the thermal adaptation of B. dorsalis.

methodsBased on a high-quality chromosome-level reference genome assembly, we explored the population relationship using a genome-scale single nucleotide polymorphism dataset generated from the resequencing data of 487 B. dorsalis genomes and 25 B. carambolae genomes. Genome-wide association studies and silencing using RNA interference were used to identify and verify the candidate genes associated with extreme thermal stress.

resultsWe showed that B. dorsalis originates from the Southern India region with three independent invasion and spread routes worldwide: (i) from Northern India to Northern Southeast Asia, then to Southern Southeast Asia; (ii) from Northern India to Northern Southeast Asian, then to China and Hawaii; and (iii) from Southern India toward the African mainland, then to Madagascar, which is mainly facilitated by human activities including trade and immigration. Twenty-seven genes were identified by a genome-wide association study to be associated with 11 temperature bioclimatic variables. The Cyp6a9 gene may enhance the thermal adaptation of B. dorsalis and thus boost its invasion, which tended to be upregulated at a hardening temperature of 38 °C. Functional verification using RNA interference silencing against Cyp6a9, led to the specific decrease in Cyp6a9 expression, reducing the survival rate of dsRNA-feeding larvae exposed to extreme thermal stress of 45 °C after heat hardening treatments in B. dorsalis.

conclusionThis study provides insights into the evolutionary history and genetic basis of temperature adaptation in B. dorsalis.

Indexed as

TephritidaeAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLarvaTemperatureBactrocera dorsalisChromosome-level genome assemblyInvasion routes and historyResequencingSpecies delimitationThermal adaptation

Identifiers

PMID36574947
PMCPMC10658297
OpenAlexW4313420218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.