Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36574737›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2023

Bilateral adaptive graph convolutional network on CT based Covid-19 diagnosis with uncertainty-aware consensus-assisted multiple instance learning.

Yanda Meng, Joshua Bridge, Cliff Addison, Manhui Wang, Cristin Merritt, Stu Franks, Maria Mackey, Steve Messenger, Renrong Sun, Thomas Fitzmaurice and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automatic Quantification of COVID-19 Pulmonary Edema by Self-supervised Contrastive Learning.Medical image learning with limited and noisy data : second international workshop, MILLanD 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, proceedings. MILLanD (Workshop) : (2nd : 2023 : Vancouver, B... · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanda MengDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Joshua BridgeDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cliff AddisonAdvanced Research Computing, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Manhui WangAdvanced Research Computing, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cristin MerrittAlces Flight Limited, Bicester, United Kingdom.
Stu FranksAlces Flight Limited, Bicester, United Kingdom.
Maria MackeyAmazon Web Services, 60 Holborn Viaduct, London, United Kingdom.
Steve MessengerAmazon Web Services, 60 Holborn Viaduct, London, United Kingdom.
Renrong SunDepartment of Radiology, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Thomas FitzmauriceAdult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Caroline McCannRadiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Qiang LiThe Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Yitian ZhaoThe Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; Cixi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science, Ningbo, China. Electronic address: yitian.zhao@nimte.ac.cn.
Yalin ZhengDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom. Electronic address: yalin.zheng@liverpool.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GBAmazon (United Kingdom) · GBNingbo University Affiliated Hospital · CNHubei University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has caused a worldwide pandemic, putting millions of people's health and lives in jeopardy. Detecting infected patients early on chest computed tomography (CT) is critical in combating COVID-19. Harnessing uncertainty-aware consensus-assisted multiple instance learning (UC-MIL), we propose to diagnose COVID-19 using a new bilateral adaptive graph-based (BA-GCN) model that can use both 2D and 3D discriminative information in 3D CT volumes with arbitrary number of slices. Given the importance of lung segmentation for this task, we have created the largest manual annotation dataset so far with 7,768 slices from COVID-19 patients, and have used it to train a 2D segmentation model to segment the lungs from individual slices and mask the lungs as the regions of interest for the subsequent analyses. We then used the UC-MIL model to estimate the uncertainty of each prediction and the consensus between multiple predictions on each CT slice to automatically select a fixed number of CT slices with reliable predictions for the subsequent model reasoning. Finally, we adaptively constructed a BA-GCN with vertices from different granularity levels (2D and 3D) to aggregate multi-level features for the final diagnosis with the benefits of the graph convolution network's superiority to tackle cross-granularity relationships. Experimental results on three largest COVID-19 CT datasets demonstrated that our model can produce reliable and accurate COVID-19 predictions using CT volumes with any number of slices, which outperforms existing approaches in terms of learning and generalisation ability. To promote reproducible research, we have made the datasets, including the manual annotations and cleaned CT dataset, as well as the implementation code, available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6361963.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingConsensusHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedUncertaintyCOVID-19CT imagesGraph convolutional networkMultiple instance learningUncertainty and consensus

Identifiers

PMID36574737
PMCPMC9753459
OpenAlexW4311543323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.