Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36574427›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Assessing electrocardiogram changes after ischemic stroke with artificial intelligence.

Ziqiang Zeng, Qixuan Wang, Yingjing Yu, Yichu Zhang, Qi Chen, Weiming Lou, Yuting Wang, Lingyu Yan, Zujue Cheng, Lijun Xu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ziqiang ZengJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China.
Qixuan WangQueen Mary School, Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yingjing YuJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China.
Yichu ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Qi ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Weiming LouInstitute of Translational Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yuting WangJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China.
Lingyu YanJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China.
Zujue ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Lijun XuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yingping YiDepartment of Medical Big Data Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Guangqin FanJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China.
Libin DengJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-5863-3829
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIschemic stroke (IS) with subsequent cerebrocardiac syndrome (CCS) has a poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate electrocardiogram (ECG) changes after IS with artificial intelligence (AI).

methodsWe collected ECGs from a healthy population and patients with IS, and then analyzed participant demographics and ECG parameters to identify abnormal features in post-IS ECGs. Next, we trained the convolutional neural network (CNN), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models to automatically detect the changes in the ECGs; Additionally, We compared the CNN scores of good prognosis (mRS ≤ 2) and poor prognosis (mRS > 2) to assess the prognostic value of CNN model. Finally, we used gradient class activation map (Grad-CAM) to localize the key abnormalities.

resultsAmong the 3506 ECGs of the IS patients, 2764 ECGs (78.84%) led to an abnormal diagnosis. Then we divided ECGs in the primary cohort into three groups, normal ECGs (N-Ns), abnormal ECGs after the first ischemic stroke (A-ISs), and normal ECGs after the first ischemic stroke (N-ISs). Basic demographic and ECG parameter analyses showed that heart rate, QT interval, and P-R interval were significantly different between 673 N-ISs and 3546 N-Ns (p < 0.05). The CNN has the best performance among the three models in distinguishing A-ISs and N-Ns (AUC: 0.88, 95%CI = 0.86-0.90). The prediction scores of the A-ISs and N-ISs obtained from the all three models are statistically different from the N-Ns (p < 0.001). Futhermore, the CNN scores of the two groups (mRS > 2 and mRS ≤ 2) were significantly different (p < 0.05). Finally, Grad-CAM revealed that the V4 lead may harbor the highest probability of abnormality.

conclusionOur study showed that a high proportion of post-IS ECGs harbored abnormal changes. Our CNN model can systematically assess anomalies in and prognosticate post-IS ECGs.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIschemic StrokeArrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID36574427
PMCPMC9794063
OpenAlexW4312207649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.