ArticlePloS one2022
Cloud-based healthcare framework for real-time anomaly detection and classification of 1-D ECG signals.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secure Fog Computing for Remote Health Monitoring with Data Prioritisation and AI-Based Anomaly Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Research on a Lightweight Arrhythmia Classification Model Based on Knowledge Distillation for Wearable Single-Lead ECG Monitoring Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Biosensing for Healthcare Using Artificial Intelligence: A Semi-Systematic Review.Biosensors · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-time data collection and pre-processing have enabled the recognition, realization, and prediction of diseases by extracting and analysing the important features of physiological data. In this research, an intelligent end-to-end system for anomaly detection and classification of raw, one-dimensional (1D) electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is given to assess cardiovascular activity automatically. The acquired raw ECG data is pre-processed carefully before storing it in the cloud, and then deeply analyzed for anomaly detection. A deep learning-based auto-encoder(AE) algorithm is applied for the anomaly detection of 1D ECG time-series signals. As a next step, the implemented system identifies it by a multi-label classification algorithm. To improve the classification accuracy and model robustness the improved feature-engineered parameters of the large and diverse datasets have been incorporated. The training has been done using the amazon web service (AWS) machine learning services and cloud-based storage for a unified solution. Multi-class classification of raw ECG signals is challenging due to a large number of possible label combinations and noise susceptibility. To overcome this problem, a performance comparison of a large set of machine algorithms in terms of classification accuracy is presented on an improved feature-engineered dataset. The proposed system reduces the raw signal size up to 95% using wavelet time scattering features to make it less compute-intensive. The results show that among several state-of-the-art techniques, the long short-term memory (LSTM) method has shown 100% classification accuracy, and an F1 score on the three-class test dataset. The ECG signal anomaly detection algorithm shows 98% accuracy using deep LSTM auto-encoders with a reconstructed error threshold of 0.02 in terms of absolute error loss. Our approach provides performance and predictive improvement with an average mean absolute error loss of 0.0072 for normal signals and 0.078 for anomalous signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.