Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36574288›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Barriers and Facilitators of Obtaining Social Determinants of Health of Patients With Cancer Through the Electronic Health Record Using Natural Language Processing Technology: Qualitative Feasibility Study With Stakeholder Interviews.

Jordan Alpert, Hyehyun Julia Kim, Cara McDonnell, Yi Guo, Thomas J George, Jiang Bian, Yonghui Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Machine learning in healthcare citizen science: A scoping review.International journal of medical informatics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jordan AlpertCleveland Clinic, Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-4748
Hyehyun Julia KimCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3052-0555
Cara McDonnellHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5035-3582
Yi GuoHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0587-4105
Thomas J GeorgeDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-9180
Jiang BianHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-5429
Yonghui WuHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6780-6135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial determinants of health (SDoH), such as geographic neighborhoods, access to health care, education, and social structure, are important factors affecting people's health and health outcomes. The SDoH of patients are scarcely documented in a discrete format in electronic health records (EHRs) but are often available in free-text clinical narratives such as physician notes. Innovative methods like natural language processing (NLP) are being developed to identify and extract SDoH from EHRs, but it is imperative that the input of key stakeholders is included as NLP systems are designed.

objectiveThis study aims to understand the feasibility, challenges, and benefits of developing an NLP system to uncover SDoH from clinical narratives by conducting interviews with key stakeholders: (1) oncologists, (2) data analysts, (3) citizen scientists, and (4) patient navigators.

methodsIndividuals who frequently work with SDoH data were invited to participate in semistructured interviews. All interviews were recorded and subsequently transcribed. After coding transcripts and developing a codebook, the constant comparative method was used to generate themes.

resultsA total of 16 participants were interviewed (5 data analysts, 4 patient navigators, 4 physicians, and 3 citizen scientists). Three main themes emerged, accompanied by subthemes. The first theme, importance and approaches to obtaining SDoH, describes how every participant (n=16, 100%) regarded SDoH as important. In particular, proximity to the hospital and income levels were frequently relied upon. Communication about SDoH typically occurs during the initial conversation with the oncologist, but more personal information is often acquired by patient navigators. The second theme, SDoH exists in numerous forms, exemplified how SDoH arises during informal communication and can be difficult to enter into the EHR. The final theme, incorporating SDoH into health services research, addresses how more informed SDoH can be collected. One strategy is to empower patients so they are aware about the importance of SDoH, as well as employing NLP techniques to make narrative data available in a discrete format, which can provide oncologists with actionable data summaries.

conclusionsExtracting SDoH from EHRs was considered valuable and necessary, but obstacles such as narrative data format can make the process difficult. NLP can be a potential solution, but as the technology is developed, it is important to consider how key stakeholders document SDoH, apply the NLP systems, and use the extracted SDoH in health outcome studies.

Indexed as

cancerclinicalcommunicationdataeducationelectronic health recordsnatural language processingpatientqualitativesocial determinants of healthtechnology

Identifiers

PMID36574288
PMCPMC9832350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.