Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36574189›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024

Receipt of follow-up care plans on colorectal cancer screening among breast, prostate, and lung cancer survivors.

Meng-Han Tsai, Malcolm S Bevel, Sydney E Andrzejak, Justin X Moore

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Survivorship care plans and adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines among cancer survivors in a national sample.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng-Han TsaiCancer Prevention, Control, & Population Health Program, Georgia Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Boulevard CN-2116, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA. metsai@augusta.edu.
Malcolm S BevelCancer Prevention, Control, & Population Health Program, Georgia Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Boulevard CN-2116, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Sydney E AndrzejakCancer Prevention, Control, & Population Health Program, Georgia Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Boulevard CN-2116, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Justin X MooreCancer Prevention, Control, & Population Health Program, Georgia Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Boulevard CN-2116, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Augusta University · US

Funding

Geographic and Racial Disparities in Mammography Screening and Barriers to Receiving CareK01MD015304 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI MOORE, JUSTIN XAVIER · 2020 to 2024
$646k
NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD015304NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD016453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur study aimed to examine whether receipt of follow-up care plans is associated with greater guideline-concordant CRC screening stratified by breast, prostate, and lung cancer survivors.

methodsWe used data from years 2016, 2018, and 2020 of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System on 3339 eligible treatment-utilizing cancer survivors with complete treatment. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression to examine the mentioned association.

resultsWe observed that 83.9% of breast and 88.2% of prostate cancer survivors with follow-care plans received CRC screening (p-value < 0.001). The lowest CRC screening use was observed among lung cancer (70.8%). In multivariable analysis, receipt of follow-up care plans was strongly associated with greater odds of receiving CRC screening in breast (OR, 2.67; 95% CI: 1.71-4.16) and prostate (OR, 3.81; 95% CI: 2.30-6.31) cancer survivors. Regardless of provider type, 84 to 88% reduced likelihood of receipt of CRC screening when they received follow-up care plans among lung cancer survivors. Among those without follow-up care plans, breast (OR, 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.92) and lung (OR, 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.25) cancer survivors who received care from general practices were less likely to receive CRC screening compared to those who received care from non-general practices.

conclusionsReceipt of follow-up care plans was associated with greater CRC screening use in breast and prostate cancers. Lung cancer survivors demonstrated lower screening use despite receipt of follow-up care plans. IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Patient and provider communication regarding CRC screening recommendation should be included in their follow-up care plans.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAftercareAgedBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedCancer survivorsColorectal cancer screeningFollow-up care planProvider

Identifiers

PMID36574189
PMCPMC10293471
OpenAlexW4312210640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.