Correlation of peripheral blood and endometrial immunophenotyping in ART: is peripheral blood sampling useful?

purposeUsing a comprehensive flow cytometric panel, simultaneously obtained mid-luteal immunophenotypes from peripheral blood and endometrium were compared and values correlated. Is a peripheral blood evaluation of reproductive immunophenotype status meritorious relative to local endometrial evaluation to directly assess the peri-implantation environment?

methodsFifty-five patients had a mid-luteal biopsy to assess the local endometrial immunophenotype, while simultaneously providing a peripheral blood sample for analysis. Both samples were immediately assessed using a comprehensive multi-parameter panel, and lymphocyte subpopulations were described and compared.

resultsDistinct lymphocyte proportions and percentage differences were noted across the two compartments, confirming the hypothesis that they are distinct environments. The ratio of CD4 + to CD8 + T cells were reversed between the two compartments, as were Th1 and Th2-type CD4 + T cell ratios. Despite these differences, some direct relationships were noted. Positive Pearson correlations were found between the levels of CD57 + expressing natural killer cells, CD3 + NK-T cells and CD4 + Th1 cells in both compartments.

conclusionsFlow cytometric evaluation provides a rapid and objective analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations. Endometrial biopsies have become the gold standard technique to assess the uterine immunophenotype in adverse reproductive outcome, but there may still a place for peripheral blood evaluation in this context. The findings demonstrate significant variations in cellular proportions across the two regions, but some positive correlations are present. Immunological assessment of these specific peripheral blood lymphocyte subtypes may provide insight into patients with potential alterations of the uterine immune environment, without the risks and inconveniences associated with an invasive procedure.