ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023
Accuracy to detect neonatal hyperglycaemia using real-time continuous glucose monitoring during postoperative period.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative use and accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring: A systematic review.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying hyperglycaemia during postoperative period is essential for neonates. The objective of the study was to analyse the accuracy and reliability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device for detecting hyperglycaemia during postoperative period in neonates. In this prospective study, hourly glucose recordings by CGM device and six hourly by glucometer glucose (GG-reference test for patient management) were collected in ten surgical neonates during first three postoperative days. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and proportion of CGM values within ± 15%/15 mg/dL, ± 20%/20 mg/dL, and ± 30%/30 mg/dL of GG, were analysed from matched pair CGM and GG recordings. The diagnostic performance of CGM for neonatal hyperglycaemia (> 150 mg/dL) was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV); and the clinical reliability was assessed in Clarke Error Grid Analysis. A total of 720 CGM glucose readings, 120 matched -paired glucose readings by CGM --GG, and 37 episodes were hyperglycaemia by GG. The MARD was 10.76 %; the percentages of glucose readings within 15%/15 mg/dL, 20%/20 mg/dL, and 30%/30 mg/dL were 94.6%, 97.3% and 100% during the hyperglycaemia period. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to detect hyperglycaaemia by CGM device were 100%, 93.9%, 88% and 100 % respectively. In Clarke Error Grid Analysis, 97.3 % points were in zone A and B during the hyperglycaemia period.
conclusionCGM device can be a clinically reliable tool for hyperglycaemia management during postoperative period in neonates. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neonates are vulnerable for hyperglycaemia during post-operative period and bed side glucometers are used for frequent glucose monitoring in them. • Continuous glucose monitor(CGM) devices are used for the glucose monitoring in adult and paediatric diabetes care. WHAT IS NEW: • For the first time, this study analysed the accuracy and clinical reliability of FreeStyle Libre (CGM device) for identifying hyperglycaemia during post-operative period in neonates. • CGM device has very good accuracy for detecting hyperglycaemia in neonates, it may help the clinician for better glucose stability during post-operative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.