Ten-day concomitant and sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori effective in region with high antibiotic resistance rates.

backgroundIncreasing antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) strains complicate efforts to eradicate infection. In regions with high dual resistance to both clarithromycin and metronidazole, bismuth quadruple therapy is recommended. But, with lack of easy availability of bismuth, the (non-bismuth) concomitant and sequential regimens are used commonly as first-line therapy. Recent reports indicate suboptimal results with sequential therapy in such regions. We aimed to compare the efficacy of concomitant therapy vs. sequential therapy in the eradication of H. pylori in a region with high antibiotic resistance rates, and to compare adherence rates and adverse events with the regimens.

methodsOne hundred and twenty-four consecutive H. pylori-infected patients (diagnosed using rapid urease test or urea breath test) were randomized to receive sequential or concomitant therapy for 10 days each. Four weeks after treatment completion, urea breath test was done to confirm eradication of the infection. Cure rates were compared between the two regimens and note was made of adherence rates and adverse events.

resultsConcomitant therapy showed a statistically non-significant higher cure rate compared to sequential therapy in intention-to-treat (87.1% vs. 81.4%%, p = 0.46) and per-protocol (94.7% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.07) analyses. Both the regimens were well tolerated and showed similar adherence rates (p = 1.00) and incidence of adverse events (p = 0.44).

conclusionIn a region with high dual resistance, both concomitant and sequential therapy for H. pylori infection achieved eradication rates >80%, but concomitant therapy showed a statistically non-significant higher cure rate, with similar adherence and adverse event profiles.