ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
In Vivo Validation of a Novel Computational Approach to Assess Microcirculatory Resistance Based on a Single Angiographic View.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05671367 (Evaluation of the Correlation Between Coronary Microvascular Resistance Based on Quantitative Flow Ratio and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Correlation Between Coronary Microvascular Resistance Based on Quantitative Flow Ratio and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of Coronary Angiographic-Derived and Intracoronary Imaging-Based Fractional Flow Reserve in Assessing Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in post-PCI target vessels: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and associated outcomes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction by Angiography-Based Index of Microcirculatory Resistance: An Indirect Meta-Analysis.Cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of Angiographic Microcirculatory Resistance After Coronary Intervention: Insights From the FAVOR III China Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Physiological Patterns of Coronary Artery Disease and Drug-Coated Balloon Performance.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Cocaine-induced acute myocardial infarction: angiographic features and outcomes.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Impact of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome on coronary microcirculation in hypertensive patients.Journal of hypertension · 2026Article
- The combined effect of arterial hypertension and coronary microvascular dysfunction in the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a real-world study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance in patients with chronic total occlusion.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Association of Angiography-Derived Coronary Microvascular Parameters with Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Uncomplicated Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Angiographic and functional assessment after paclitaxel or sirolimus drug-coated balloons for de novo coronary artery disease in small vessels: PICCOLETO VI study.AsiaIntervention · 2026Article
- Stress hyperglycemia ratio is associated with microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Insulin or Dapagliflozin Potentially Improves Microcirculatory Dysfunction or INOCA Related to Culprit Vessels in Diabetic Patients With STEMI After DCB Therapy During Long-Term Follow-Up.Journal of diabetes · 2026Observational
- Genes with abnormal DNA methylation in chorionic villi of spontaneous abortions with monosomy X.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- The association between coronary microvascular dysfunction and HbA1c in patients with unstable angina pectoris.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Elevated angiography-derived microvascular resistance and HbA1c levels jointly predict adverse outcomes in patients with diabetic STEMI: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Article
- Association of the TyG index and inflammatory burden index with AMR-defined coronary microvascular dysfunction and 12-month MACE after STEMI.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Chronic Kidney Disease, Circulating Ceramides, and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Insights from the CRUISE-MET Study.Cardiorenal medicine · 2026Observational
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: In spite of the undeniable clinical value of the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) in assessing the status of coronary microcirculation, its use globally remains very low. The aim of this study was to validate the novel single-view, pressure-wire- and adenosine-free angiographic microvascular resistance (AMR) index, having the invasive wire-based IMR as a reference standard. (2) Methods: one hundred and sixty-three patients (257 vessels) were investigated with pressure wire-based IMR. Microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was defined by IMR ≥ 25. AMR was independently computed from the diagnostic coronary angiography in a blinded fashion. (3) Results: AMR demonstrated a good correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and diagnostic performance (AUC 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91 to 0.97) compared with wire-based IMR. The best cutoff value for AMR in determining IMR ≥ 25 was 2.5 mmHg*s/cm. The overall diagnostic accuracy of AMR was 87.2% (95% CI: 83.0% to 91.3%), with a sensitivity of 93.5% (95% CI: 87.0% to 97.3%), a specificity of 82.7% (95% CI: 75.6% to 88.4%), a positive predictive value of 79.4% (95% CI: 71.2% to 86.1%) and a negative predictive value of 94.7% (95% CI: 89.3% to 97.8%). No difference in terms of CMD rate was described among different clinical presentations. (4) Conclusions: AMR derived solely from a single angiographic view is a feasible computational alternative to pressure wire-based IMR, with good diagnostic accuracy in assessing CMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.