Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36573484›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthodontics2023

In vivo aging-induced surface roughness alterations of Invisalign

Despina Koletsi, Nearchos Panayi, Christodoulos Laspos, Athanasios E Athanasiou, Spiros Zinelis, Theodore Eliades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Directly Printed Aligner: Aligning with the Future.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Despina KoletsiClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6280-9372
Nearchos PanayiClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christodoulos LasposDepartment of Dentistry, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Athanasios E AthanasiouDepartment of Dentistry, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-8557-4833
Spiros ZinelisDepartment of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9188-7839
Theodore EliadesClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-4979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the surface roughness of in-house 3D-printed orthodontic aligners compared with Invisalign

designAn in vitro study following intra-oral material aging. SETTING AND

participantsTwelve clinically used Invisalign

methodFour groups of materials were examined: A = Invisalign

resultsIntra-oral exposure of 3D-printed aligners was significantly associated with increase in all tested parameters (

conclusionWithin the limitations of this study, we concluded that surface roughness differences existed between 3D-printed aligners and Invisalign

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliances, RemovableAgingHumansPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D-printedalignersInvisalign®optical profilometryroughnesssurface characterisation

Identifiers

PMID36573484
PMCPMC10693732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.