Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36573311›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2022

Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media: The diagnosis of allergy by skin testing.

Juliette Caron, Sahara Graf, Christine Delebarre-Sauvage

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliette CaronService d'allergologie et d'éducation thérapeutique, Hôpital Saint Vincent-de-Paul, Lille Cedex, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7555-8573
Sahara GrafDélégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation, Unité de Biostatistiques, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Lomme Cedex, France.
Christine Delebarre-SauvageService d'allergologie et d'éducation thérapeutique, Hôpital Saint Vincent-de-Paul, Lille Cedex, France.
Hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul · FRHôpital Saint-Philibert · FR

Funding

Catholic Institute of Lille Hospital Group
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among 74 patients with an immediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHR) to iodinated contrast media (ICM), the rate of allergic patients confirmed by positive prick test or diluted intradermal test (IDT) was 8.1%. 12.5% of re-exposed patients had a recurrent IHR despite negative skin tests. Investigations on pure IDT to ICM and development of drug provocation test may provide additional safety nets to uncover recurrent ICM reactors. Agreements among allergists are needed to unify practices.

Indexed as

allergyhypersensitivityiodinated contrast mediaskin tests

Identifiers

PMID36573311
PMCPMC9720225
OpenAlexW4311510004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.