Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36573256›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Evaluation of a workflow for cone-beam CT-guided online adaptive palliative radiotherapy planned using diagnostic CT scans.

Koen J Nelissen, Eva Versteijne, Suresh Senan, Daan Hoffmans, Ben J Slotman, Wilko F A R Verbakel

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The feasibility of CT simulation-free adaptive radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Koen J NelissenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva VersteijneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suresh SenanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daan HoffmansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ben J SlotmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilko F A R VerbakelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Varian Medical Systems
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSingle-visit radiotherapy (RT) is beneficial for patients requiring pain control and can limit interruptions to systemic treatments. However, the requirement for a dedicated planning CT (pCT)-scan can result in treatment delays. We developed a workflow involving preplanning on available diagnostic CT (dCT) imaging, followed by online plan adaption using a cone-beam CT (CBCT)-scan prior to RT-delivery, in order to account for any changes in anatomy and target position.

methodsPatients previously treated with palliative RT for bone metastases were selected from our hospital database. Patient dCT-images were deformed to treatment CBCTs in the Ethos platform (Varian Medical Systems) and a synthetic CT (sCT) generated. Treatment quality was analyzed by comparing a coverage of the V95% of the planning/clinical target volume and different organ-at-risk (OAR) doses between adapted and initial clinical treatment plans. Doses were recalculated on the CBCT and sCT in a separate treatment planning system. Adapted plan doses were measured on-couch using an anthropomorphic phantom with a Gafchromic EBT3 dosimetric film and compared to dose calculations.

resultsAll adapted treatment plans met the clinical goals for target and OARs and outperformed the original treatment plans calculated on the (daily) sCT. Differences in V95% of the target volume coverage between the initial and adapted treatments were <0.2%. Dose recalculations on CBCT and sCT were comparable, and the average gamma pass rate (3%/2 mm) of dosimetric measurements was 98.8%.

conclusionsOnline daily adaptive RT using dCTs instead of a dedicated pCT is feasible using the Ethos platform. This workflow has now been implemented clinically.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansRadiotherapy DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedWorkflowantropomorphic phantommetastasesonline adaptive radiotherapysimulation CT free workflowsingle visit palliation

Identifiers

PMID36573256
PMCPMC10018665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read67
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.