Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36573065›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2022

Digital consultation in primary healthcare: the effects on access, efficiency and patient safety based on provider experience; a qualitative study.

Pär Eriksson, Tora Hammar, Stefan Lagrosen, Evalill Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pär ErikssonDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Tora HammarDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Stefan LagrosenDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Evalill NilssonDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to explore the experiences of healthcare staff working with and being part of the implementation of a digital platform for patient-provider consultation across quality dimensions of access, efficiency, and patient safety.

designThe study uses qualitative design to investigate experiences and the views of healthcare professionals. Data collection combined semi-structured individual and focus-group interviews. Content analysis was used to identify categories within the content areas 'access', 'efficiency', and 'patient safety'.

settingThe basis for the study was an e-consultation platform introduced in three primary healthcare centres in the County of Kalmar in southeast Sweden in 2019.

resultsHealthcare staff experienced that the platform offered an open channel for communication with patients in need of frequent contact. This reduced anxiety and therefore the frequency of follow-up appointments. Healthcare staff also noted that the platform offered flexibility in contact benefitting patients with mental health problems. These patients were found to make contact through the platform after closing hours when problems were more acute or intense. However, the risk of digitally illiterate groups being excluded was also noted. Efficiency gains were identified among patients with simple cases which were handled more quickly through the platform. However, low uptake and the experience that the platform did not replace, rather was added on top of other already existing functions and procedures, negatively affected the overall efficiency. Standardized questions in automated medical history-taking contributed to patient safety.

conclusionThe findings suggest that text-based e-consultation platforms may bring important quality improvements to primary healthcare service in terms of access, efficiency, and patient safety. Yet, areas where e-consultation does not contribute to quality improvements puts important quality gains at risk.KEY POINTSText based digital consultation improved access for patients in need of frequent appointments and for patients with mental health problems.Efficiency gains among patients with simple cases, and in dealing with patients with mental health problems were noted. However, lack of confidence in platform functions due to low uptake, and limited control over work situation, were perceived as negatively affecting overall efficiency.Health care staff experienced improved patient safety through a standardized set of questions in automated medical history-taking.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth ServicesHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationdigital technologye-healthPrimary healthcareprovider experiencetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36573065
PMCPMC9848242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.