Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36573019›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2023

Inequalities in cesarean births between American Indian & Alaska Native people and White people.

Danielle R Gartner, Michelle P Debbink, Jada L Brooks, Claire E Margerison

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Health Disparities in the Use of Primary Cesarean Delivery among Asian American Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle R GartnerDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0152-8961
Michelle P DebbinkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jada L BrooksSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Claire E MargerisonDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Michigan State University · USIntermountain Healthcare · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Policy Change and Women's HealthR01HD095951 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MARGERISON, CLAIRE E · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore population-level American Indian & Alaska Native-White inequalities in cesarean birth incidence after accounting for differences in cesarean indication, age, and other individual-level risk factors. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingWe used birth certificate data inclusive of all live births within the United States between January 1 and December 31, 2017. STUDY

designWe calculated propensity score weights that simultaneously incorporate age, cesarean indication, and clinical and obstetric risk factors to estimate the American Indian and Alaska Native-White inequality. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsBirths to individuals identified as American Indian, Alaska Native, or White, and residing in one of the 50 US states or the District of Columbia were included. Births were excluded if missing maternal race/ethnicity or any other covariate. PRINCIPAL

findingsAfter weighing the American Indian and Alaska Native obstetric population to be comparable to the distribution of cesarean indication, age, and clinical and obstetric risk factors of the White population, the cesarean incidence among American Indian and Alaska Natives increased to 33.4% (95% CI: 32.0-34.8), 3.2 percentage points (95% CI: 1.8-4.7) higher than the observed White incidence. After adjustment, cesarean birth incidence remained higher and increased in magnitude among American Indian and Alaska Natives in Robson groups 1 (low risk, primary), 6 (nulliparous, breech presentation), and 9 (transverse/oblique lie).

conclusionsThe unadjusted lower cesarean birth incidence observed among American Indian and Alaska Native individuals compared to White individuals may be related to their younger mean age at birth. After adjusting for this demographic difference, we demonstrate that American Indian and Alaska Native individuals undergo cesarean birth more frequently than White individuals with similar risk profiles, particularly within the low-risk Robson group 1 and those with non-cephalic presentations (Robson groups 6 and 9). Racism and bias in clinical decision making, structural racism, colonialism, or other unidentified factors may contribute to this inequality.

Indexed as

American Indian or Alaska NativeCesarean SectionHealthcare DisparitiesIndians, North AmericanWhiteFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyUnited Statescesareanhealth servicesinequalityracerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36573019
PMCPMC10012218
OpenAlexW4312200895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.