Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36572946›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2022

Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hyeon-Jeong Lee, Junghyun Kim, Miyoung Choi, Won-Il Choi, Joonsung Joh, Jungeun Park, Joohae Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Awake prone positioning in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyeon-Jeong Lee *Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, South Korea.
Junghyun Kim *Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Miyoung ChoiDivision of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, South Korea.
Won-Il ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Joonsung JohDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jungeun ParkDivision of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, South Korea.
Joohae KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. joohaekim23@gmail.com.
National Evidenc- based healthcare Collaborating Agency · KRHallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHanyang University · KRNational Medical Center · KRSacred Heart Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProne position has already been demonstrated to improve survival in non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome and has been widely performed in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure, both in non-intubated and intubated patients. However, the beneficial effect of the prone position in COVID-19 pneumonia still remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the prone position compared with the non-prone in non-intubated and intubated COVID-19 patients, respectively.

methodsWe searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, as well as one Korean domestic database, on July 9, 2021, and updated the search 9 times to September 14, 2022. Studies that compared prone and non-prone positions in patients with COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were mortality, need for intubation, and adverse events.

resultsOf the 1259 records identified, 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 23 nonrandomized studies (NRSs) were eligible. In the non-intubated patients, the prone position reduced the intubation rate compared with the non-prone position in 6 RCTs (n = 2156, RR 0.81, P = 0.0002) and in 18 NRSs (n = 3374, RR 0.65, P = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis according to the oxygen delivery method, the results were constant only in the HFNC or NIV subgroup. For mortality, RCTs reported no difference between prone and non-prone groups, but in NRSs, the prone position had a significant advantage in mortality [18 NRSs, n = 3361, relative risk (RR) 0.56, P < 0.00001] regardless of the oxygen delivery methods shown in the subgroup analysis. There was no RCT for intubated patients, and mortality did not differ between the prone and non-prone groups in NRSs. Adverse events reported in both the non-intubated and intubated groups were mild and similar between the prone and non-intubated groups.

conclusionFor non-intubated patients with COVID-19, prone positioning reduced the risk of intubation, particularly in patients requiring a high-flow oxygen system. However, the survival benefit was unclear between the prone and non-prone groups. There was insufficient evidence to support the beneficial effects of prone positioning in intubated patients. Trial registration This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on February 16, 2022 (Registration No.: CRD42022311150 ).

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory InsufficiencyHumansOxygenPatient PositioningOxygenAcute respiratory distress syndromeCOVID-19Prone position

Identifiers

PMID36572946
PMCPMC9792321
OpenAlexW4313249090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.