ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2022
The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with NSTEMI and multivessel disease.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome at Various Stages of the Diagnostic Process: Observational Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Observational
- Independent and Incremental Prognostic Value of the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Beyond the GRACE Score for Predicting 1-Year Mortality in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Predicting long-term major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention in individuals with acute coronary syndrome and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a machine learning study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Development and validation of predictive models for prognostic assessment in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicentre real-world study from China.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Determinants of In-hospital Death in Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Triple-vessel Disease.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- The Prognostic Value of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index for Major Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predictive factors for multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome: analysis from the CCC-ACS project in China.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- The Predictive Role of Cardiac Troponin Elevation Ratio Combined With Heart Function Index Model in the Prognosis of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.Cardiology research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGRACE risk score models are capable of predicting all-cause mortality of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. However, its utility for evaluating major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in NSTEMI patients with multivessel disease (MVD) remains unclear. METHODS AND
resultsThis study was designed as a retrospective cohort study that recruited patients with NSTEMI and multivessel disease between September 2013 and December 2018 in Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China. The primary outcome was a composite outcome that included all-cause mortality, recurrent angina, non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary re-vascularization, and non-fatal strokes. Of the 827 patients with NSTEMI, 32 did not complete follow-up and 430 were excluded because of single-vessel disease. The remaining 365 NSTEMI patients with MVD had a median follow-up of 3.0 (IQR 2.6-3.3) years, 78 patients experienced outcomes. The GRACE risk score predicted the MACE (hazard ratio 1.014, 95% CI 1.006-1.021, P < 0.001). The GRACE risk score performed well in predicting all-cause mortality (c-statistic 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.85, P = 0.001) in MVD but was less powerful in predicting MACE (c-statistic 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.75, P < 0.001). When combining the GRACE risk score with the SYNTAX score, and blood urea nitrogen for predicting all-cause mortality and MACE events, the c-statistic value increased to 0.82 and 0.81 (P < 0.001).
conclusionIn NSTEMI patients with MVD, the GRACE score showed an acceptable predictive value for all-cause mortality, but it was less powerful in predicting MACE. Blood urea nitrogen may be valuable in assessing long-term cardiovascular events in patients with MVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.