Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36572742›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2023

"It was Very Liberating". Dialogic Literary Gatherings Supporting Mental Health Literacy.

Harkaitz Zubiri-Esnaola, Sandra Racionero-Plaza, Aitana Fernández-Villardón, Sara Carbonell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harkaitz Zubiri-EsnaolaDepartment of Language and Literature Didactics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5780-1357
Sandra Racionero-PlazaDepartment of Sociology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. sandraracionero@ub.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8347-5794
Aitana Fernández-VillardónFaculty of Education & Sports, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9690-022X
Sara CarbonellFaculty of Education, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-8199
Universidad de Deusto · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Girona · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health is being reframed as a fundamental right for all people, and mental health literacy is a tool that can enable patients to gain the knowledge, personal skills, and confidence to take action to improve their mental health, and their lives overall. This exploratory study analysed the power of dialogic literary gatherings (DLGs) to foster it in a group of patients with mental health disorders who gathered for 1 h once a week to share their readings of literature masterpieces. During the year-long study, a total of 140 patients participated in the DLGs in groups of 12 to 15 people. Results suggest that DLGs promoted the development of the participants' mental health literacy and produced gains in emotional and social wellbeing by strengthening reading, speaking, and listening skills, fostering supportive relations, contributing to overcoming stigma, and enhancing agency. The transferability of DLGs to mental health care is discussed.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyMental DisordersEmotionsHumansMental HealthSocial StigmaDialogic literary gatheringsHealth literacyMental disordersMental healthMental health literacySuccessful educational action

Identifiers

PMID36572742
PMCPMC10224808
OpenAlexW4312210798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.