Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36572718›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Multi-objective learning and explanation for stroke risk assessment in Shanxi province.

Jing Ma, Yiyang Sun, Junjie Liu, Huaxiong Huang, Xiaoshuang Zhou, Shixin Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing MaResearch Center for Mathematics, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, 519087, China.
Yiyang SunGlobal Health Research Center, Data Science Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, 8 Duke Ave, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Junjie LiuBNU-HKBU United International College, Zhuhai, China.
Huaxiong HuangResearch Center for Mathematics, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, 519087, China. hhuang@uic.edu.cn.
Xiaoshuang ZhouDepartment of Nephrology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China. zhouxiaoshuang@sxmu.edu.cn.
Shixin XuGlobal Health Research Center, Data Science Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, 8 Duke Ave, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China. shixin.xu@dukekunshan.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the leading cause of death in China (Zhou et al. in The Lancet, 2019). A dataset from Shanxi Province is analyzed to predict the risk of patients at four states (low/medium/high/attack) and to estimate transition probabilities between various states via a SHAP DeepExplainer. To handle the issues related to an imbalanced sample set, the quadratic interactive deep model (QIDeep) was first proposed by flexible selection and appending of quadratic interactive features. The experimental results showed that the QIDeep model with 3 interactive features achieved the state-of-the-art accuracy 83.33%(95% CI (83.14%; 83.52%)). Blood pressure, physical inactivity, smoking, weight, and total cholesterol are the top five most important features. For the sake of high recall in the attack state, stroke occurrence prediction is considered an auxiliary objective in multi-objective learning. The prediction accuracy was improved, while the recall of the attack state was increased by 17.79% (to 82.06%) compared to QIDeep (from 71.49%) with the same features. The prediction model and analysis tool in this paper provided not only a prediction method but also an attribution explanation of the risk states and transition direction of each patient, a valuable tool for doctors to analyze and diagnose the disease.

Indexed as

StrokeBlood PressureHumansLearningRisk AssessmentSmoking

Identifiers

PMID36572718
PMCPMC9792526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.