Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36572717›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2023

Task parameters influence operant response variability in mice.

Emma G Follman, Maxime Chevée, Courtney J Kim, Amy R Johnson, Jennifer Tat, Michael Z Leonard, Erin S Calipari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma G FollmanDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Maxime Chevée *Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Courtney J KimDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Amy R JohnsonDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jennifer TatDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael Z LeonardDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Erin S CalipariDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. erin.calipari@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4723-0623

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Program in NeurogenomicsT32MH065215 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ROGER J COLBRAN · 2002 to 2026
$6.4M
Mechanisms of dopaminergic dysfunction in substance use disorderR01DA052317 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CALIPARI, ERIN · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Making and breaking opioid memories to prevent relapseDP1DA048931 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CALIPARI, ERIN · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Defining the Role of D1 and D2 Medium Spiny Neurons in Relapse to Cocaine SeekingR00DA042111 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CALIPARI, ERIN · 2018 to 2020
$747k
Defining the Role of D1 and D2 Medium Spiny Neurons in Relapse to Cocaine SeekingK99DA042111 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CALIPARI, ERIN · 2016 to 2017
$301k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA048931NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA042111NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA042111NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052317NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH065215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDuring operant conditioning, animals associate actions with outcomes. However, patterns and rates of operant responding change over learning, which makes it difficult to distinguish changes in learning from general changes in performance or movement. Thus, understanding how task parameters influence movement execution is essential.

objectivesTo understand how specific operant task parameters influenced the repetition of future operant responses, we investigated the ability of operant conditioning schedules and contingencies to promote reproducible bouts of five lever presses in mice.

methodsMice were trained on one of the four operant tasks to test three distinct hypotheses: (1) whether a cue presented concurrently with sucrose delivery influenced the pattern of lever pressing; (2) whether requiring animals to collect earned sucrose promoted the organization of responses into bouts; and (3) whether only reinforcing bouts where interresponse time (IRT) variances were below a target promoted reproducible patterns of operant behavior.

results(1) Signaling reinforcer delivery with a cue increased learning rates but resulted in mice pressing the lever in fast succession until the cue turned on, rather than executing discrete bouts. (2) Requiring mice to collect the reinforcer between bouts had little effect on behavior. (3) A training strategy that directly reinforced bouts with low variance IRTs was not more effective than a traditional fixed ratio schedule at promoting reproducible action execution.

conclusionsTogether, our findings provide insights into the parameters of behavioral training that promote reproducible actions and that should be carefully selected when designing operant conditioning experiments.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantSucroseAnimalsMiceReinforcement ScheduleTime FactorsSucroseFixed ratioFR5Interresponse timesLearningMovement kinematicsReinforcement scheduleReinforcerReward

Identifiers

PMID36572717
PMCPMC9894580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.