ReviewBMJ open2022
Measures used to assess interventions for increasing patient involvement in Danish healthcare setting: a rapid review.
Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making in the South Korean healthcare system.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- The Balancing Act of Involving Relatives of Hospitalised Patients: A Qualitative Study of Attitudes, Expectations and Involvement Among Patients, Relatives and Healthcare Professionals.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Feasibility, acceptability, and usability of a patient decision aid for participation in the DAHANCA 35 proton radiotherapy trial: A qualitative study.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Shared decision-making in radiotherapy for rectal cancer - A systematic review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Knowledge user involvement is still uncommon in published rapid reviews-a meta-research cross-sectional study.Research synthesis methods · 2025Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of the ShareD dEciSIon making for patients with kidney failuRE to improve end-of-life care intervention: A pilot multicentre randomised controlled trial.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Health service provider views on measuring patient involvement in healthcare: an interview study with researchers, clinicians, service managers, and policymakers.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Measuring healthcare professionals' perceptions of their ability to adopt shared decision making: Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the IcanSDM questionnaire.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Survey of service needs to embed genome sequencing for motor neuron disease in neurology in the English National Health Service.Journal of medical genetics · 2024Article
- Person-centred medicine in the care home setting: development of a complex intervention.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Motivational strategies used by health care professionals in stroke survivors in rehabilitation: a scoping review of experimental studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Review
- Fixing the Leaky Pipe: How to Improve the Uptake of Patient-Reported Outcomes-Based Prognostic and Predictive Models in Cancer Clinical Practice.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Integrating Patient Involvement Interventions within Clinical Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study of Health Care Professional Reasoning.MDM policy & practiceArticle
- Development of a Patient Decision Aid for the DAHANCA 35 Proton Radiotherapy Trial: An Iterative Development Process with User-Centered Design Elements.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify measures used within Denmark evaluating any type of intervention designed to facilitate patient involvement in healthcare.
designEnvironmental scan employing rapid review methods. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycInfo and CINAHL were searched from 6-9 April 2021 from database inception up to the date of the search. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Quantitative, observational and mixed methods studies with empirical data on outcomes used to assess any type of intervention aiming to increase patient involvement with their healthcare. Language limitations were Danish and English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data from 10% of the included studies and, due to their agreement, the data from the rest were extracted by first author. Data were analysed with reference to existing categories of measuring person-centred care; findings were synthesised using narrative summaries. Adapted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines were used to guide reporting.
resultsAmong 3767 records, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 74 different measures used to evaluate interventions aimed at increasing patient involvement within healthcare in Danish hospital and community settings. Generic measures assessed: patient engagement (n=3); supporting self-management (n=8); supporting shared decision-making (n=9); patient satisfaction and experiences of care (n=11); health-related patient-reported outcome (n=20).
conclusionsAcross Denmark, complex interventions designed to improve patient involvement with healthcare vary in their goals and content. Some targeting healthcare professionals, some patient health literacy and some service infrastructure. A plethora of measures assess the impact of these interventions on patient, professional and service delivery outcomes. Few measures assessed patient involvement directly, and it is unclear which proxy measures capture indicators of perceived involvement. Lack of conceptual clarity between intervention goals, the components of change and measures makes it difficult to see what types of intervention can best support change in services to ensure patients are more effectively involved in their healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.