Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36572495›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

Measures used to assess interventions for increasing patient involvement in Danish healthcare setting: a rapid review.

Bente Skovsby Toft, Lotte Rodkjaer, Anne Bendix Andersen, Annette de Thurah, Berit Nielsen, Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen, Jens Thusgård Hørlück, Lisbeth Kallestrup, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Mette Spliid Ludvigsen and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Shared decision-making in radiotherapy for rectal cancer - A systematic review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bente Skovsby ToftResearch Centre of Patient Involvement, Århus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark betoft@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-3107-1699
Lotte RodkjaerResearch Centre of Patient Involvement, Århus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne Bendix AndersenResearch Centre of Health and Welfare Technology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Annette de ThurahDepartment of Rheumatology, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Berit NielsenDepartment of Public Health, DEFACTUM - Public Health and Quality Improvement, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Camilla Palmhøj NielsenDepartment of Public Health, DEFACTUM - Public Health and Quality Improvement, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Jens Thusgård HørlückSocial and Health Services and Labour Market, Defactum, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark.
Lisbeth KallestrupDepartment of Quality and Patient Involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Liv Marit Valen SchougaardAmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.
Mette Spliid LudvigsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Midtjylland, Denmark.
Mette Terp HoybyeInterdisciplinary Research Unit, Elective Surgery Center, Regionshospitalet Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Midtjylland, Denmark.
Trine EllegaardPsychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hilary BekkerLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify measures used within Denmark evaluating any type of intervention designed to facilitate patient involvement in healthcare.

designEnvironmental scan employing rapid review methods. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycInfo and CINAHL were searched from 6-9 April 2021 from database inception up to the date of the search. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Quantitative, observational and mixed methods studies with empirical data on outcomes used to assess any type of intervention aiming to increase patient involvement with their healthcare. Language limitations were Danish and English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data from 10% of the included studies and, due to their agreement, the data from the rest were extracted by first author. Data were analysed with reference to existing categories of measuring person-centred care; findings were synthesised using narrative summaries. Adapted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines were used to guide reporting.

resultsAmong 3767 records, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 74 different measures used to evaluate interventions aimed at increasing patient involvement within healthcare in Danish hospital and community settings. Generic measures assessed: patient engagement (n=3); supporting self-management (n=8); supporting shared decision-making (n=9); patient satisfaction and experiences of care (n=11); health-related patient-reported outcome (n=20).

conclusionsAcross Denmark, complex interventions designed to improve patient involvement with healthcare vary in their goals and content. Some targeting healthcare professionals, some patient health literacy and some service infrastructure. A plethora of measures assess the impact of these interventions on patient, professional and service delivery outcomes. Few measures assessed patient involvement directly, and it is unclear which proxy measures capture indicators of perceived involvement. Lack of conceptual clarity between intervention goals, the components of change and measures makes it difficult to see what types of intervention can best support change in services to ensure patients are more effectively involved in their healthcare.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPatient ParticipationDenmarkHospitalsHumansLanguageeducation & training (see medical education & training)health services administration & managementquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36572495
PMCPMC9806071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.