Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36572398›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2023

Pathological complete response in multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Julian Hipp, Jasmina Kuvendjiska, Hans Christian Hillebrecht, Sylvia Timme-Bronsert, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Jens Hoeppner, Markus K Diener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julian HippDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9291-9695
Jasmina KuvendjiskaDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Hans Christian HillebrechtDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Sylvia Timme-BronsertInstitute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine - University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 115A, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Stefan Fichtner-FeiglDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Jens HoeppnerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Markus K DienerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate pathological complete response (pCR, ypT0ypN0) after neoadjuvant treatment compared with non-complete response (non-CR) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC), and 393 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Survival probability was analyzed in patients with: (i) pCR vs non-CR; (ii) complete response of the primary tumor but persisting lymphatic metastases (non-CR-T0N+) and (iii) pCR and tumor-free lymphnodes exhibiting signs of postneoadjuvant regression vs. no signs of regression. (i) Median overall survival (mOS) was favorable in patients with pCR (pCR: mOS not reached vs. non-CR: 41 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that grade of regression was not an independent predictor for prolonged survival. Instead, the achieved postneoadjuvant TNM-stage (T-stage: Hazard ratio [HR] ypT3-T4 vs. ypT0-T2: 1.837; N-stage: HR ypN1-N3 vs. ypN0: 2.046; Postneoadjuvant M-stage: HR ypM1 vs. ycM0: 2.709), the residual tumor (R)-classification (HR R1 vs. R0: 4.195) and the histologic subtype of EC (HR ESCC vs. EAC: 1.688) were prognostic factors. Patients with non-CR-T0N+ have a devastating prognosis, similar to those with local non-CR and lymphatic metastases (non-CR-T + N+) (non-CR-T0N+: 22.0 months, non-CR-T + N-: mOS not reached, non-CR-T + N+: 23.0 months; P-values: non-CR-T0N+ vs. non-CR-T + N-: 0.016; non-CR-T0N+ vs. non-CR-T + N+: 0.956; non-CR-T + N- vs. non-CR-T + N+: <0.001). Regressive changes in lymphnodes after neoadjuvant treatment did not influence survival-probability in patients with pCR (mOS not reached in each group; EAC-patients: P = 0.0919; ESCC-patients: P = 0.828). Particularly, the achieved postneoadjuvant ypTNM-stage influences the survival probability of patients with EC. Patients with non-CR-T0N+ have a dismal prognosis, and only true pathological complete response with ypT0ypN0 offers superior survival probabilities.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyCombined Modality TherapyHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studieschemoradiationchemotherapyesophageal canceresophagogastric junction cancermultimodal treatmentneoadjuvant treatmentoncologic surgerypathologic complete responsevisceral surgery

Identifiers

PMID36572398
PMCPMC10317005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.