Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36572339›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2023

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Overview of Challenges and Opportunities in Revising the Nodal Classification of Lung Cancer.

Raymond Uyiosa Osarogiagbon, Paul Van Schil, Dorothy J Giroux, Eric Lim, Paul Martin Putora, Yolande Lievens, Giuseppe Cardillo, Hong Kwan Kim, Gaetano Rocco, Andrea Bille and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breaking: The New 9Thoracic research and practice · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

Raymond Uyiosa OsarogiagbonMultidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee. Electronic address: rosarogi@bmhcc.org.
Paul Van SchilDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Dorothy J GirouxCancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington.
Eric LimImperial College London, London, United Kingdom; The Academic Division of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Paul Martin PutoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yolande LievensRadiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Giuseppe CardilloAzienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy; UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Hong Kwan KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gaetano RoccoThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Andrea BilleDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; King's College University, London, United Kingdom.
Helmut ProschDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Francisco Suárez VásquezThoracic Surgeon, Surgery Department, Clínica Santa María, Santiago, Chile; Universidad de Los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Katherine K NishimuraCancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington.
Frank DetterbeckDepartment of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ramon Rami-PortaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain; Network of Centres for Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES) Lung Cancer Group, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Valerie W RuschThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Hisao AsamuraDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
James HuangThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Members of the N-Descriptors Subcommittee
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USAntwerp University Hospital · BECentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESClinica Santa Maria · CLGhent University Hospital · BEGuy's Hospital · GBKeio University · JPRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · ITSungkyunkwan University · KRUniversity of Bern · CHVienna General Hospital · ATYale University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Improving pathologic nodal staging of resected lung cancerR01CA172253 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI OSAROGIAGBON, RAYMOND U · 2013 to 2022
$4.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The status of lymph node involvement is a major component of the TNM staging system. The N categories for lung cancer have remained unchanged since the fourth edition of the TNM staging system, partly because of differences in nodal mapping nomenclature, partly because of insufficient details to verify possible alternative approaches for staging. In preparation for the rigorous analysis of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer database necessary for the ninth edition TNM staging system, members of the N-Descriptors Subcommittee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee reviewed the evidence for alternative approaches to categorizing the extent of lymph node involvement with lung cancer, which is currently based solely on the anatomical location of lymph node metastasis. We reviewed the literature focusing on NSCLC to stimulate dialogue and mutual understanding among subcommittee members engaged in developing the ninth edition TNM staging system for lung cancer, which has been proposed for adoption by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control in 2024. The discussion of the range of possible revision options for the N categories, including the pros and cons of counting lymph nodes, lymph node stations, or lymph node zones, also provides transparency to the process, explaining why certain options may be discarded, others deferred for future consideration. Finally, we provide a preliminary discussion of the future directions that the N-Descriptors Subcommittee might consider for the 10th edition and beyond.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHumansLungLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingPrognosis9th edition TNMLymph nodeN-categoriesNon–small cell lung cancerStagingStaging system

Identifiers

PMID36572339
PMCPMC10065917
OpenAlexW4312156790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.