Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36572279›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2023

Hypothesis-driven modeling of the human lung-ventilator system: A characterization tool for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome research.

J N Stroh, Bradford J Smith, Peter D Sottile, George Hripcsak, David J Albers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developing A Data Pipeline to Quantify Ventilator Waveforms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J N StrohDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado, Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: jn.stroh@cuanschutz.edu.
Bradford J SmithDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Colorado, Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Section of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Peter D SottileDivision of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
David J AlbersDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado, Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Section of Informatics and Data Science, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Predicting and Preventing Ventilator-Induced Lung InjuryR01HL151630 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SMITH, BRADFORD J · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is an essential tool in the management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), but it exposes patients to the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The human lung-ventilator system (LVS) involves the interaction of complex anatomy with a mechanical apparatus, which limits the ability of process-based models to provide individualized clinical support. This work proposes a hypothesis-driven strategy for LVS modeling in which robust personalization is achieved using a pre-defined parameter basis in a non-physiological model. Model inversion, here via windowed data assimilation, forges observed waveforms into interpretable parameter values that characterize the data rather than quantifying physiological processes. Accurate, model-based inference on human-ventilator data indicates model flexibility and utility over a variety of breath types, including those from dyssynchronous LVSs. Estimated parameters generate static characterizations of the data that are 50%-70% more accurate than breath-wise single-compartment model estimates. They also retain sufficient information to distinguish between the types of breath they represent. However, the fidelity and interpretability of model characterizations are tied to parameter definitions and model resolution. These additional factors must be considered in conjunction with the objectives of specific applications, such as identifying and tracking the development of human VILI.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryHumansLungRespiration, ArtificialVentilators, MechanicalBiomedical informaticsData assimilationHealth information managementKalman filtersMathematical modelParameter estimation

Identifiers

PMID36572279
PMCPMC9788853
OpenAlexW4312112757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.