Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36571813›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2023

Estimating the relationship between liquid- and vapor-phase odorant concentrations using a photoionization detector (PID)-based approach.

Liam Jennings, Ellie Williams, Samuel Caton, Marta Avlas, Adam Dewan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Temporal sequence geometry enables odor recognition and generalization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gustatory and olfactory-guided responsiveness to maltodextrin solutions in mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liam JenningsDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7824-2956
Ellie WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9935-9774
Samuel CatonDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6092-3112
Marta AvlasDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5447-834X
Adam DewanDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1627-5730
Florida State University · US

Funding

Chemosensory Training Program (CTP)T32DC000044 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEBRA Ann FADOOL · 1995 to 2026
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory studies frequently utilize odor stimuli consisting of volatiles created from liquid dilutions of various chemicals. A problem arises if the researcher relies on these liquid dilutions to extrapolate vapor concentrations based on ideal gas behavior. For most chemicals, the relationship between liquid and vapor concentration deviates from these laws of proportionality due to interactions between the chemical and the solvent. Here, we describe a method to estimate vapor-phase concentrations of diluted odorants using a photoionization detector. To demonstrate the utility of this method, we assessed the relationship between liquid-/vapor-phase concentrations for 14 odorants (7 alcohols, 1 ester, and 6 aldehydes) in 5 different solvents (water, mineral oil, diethyl phthalate, dipropylene glycol, and propylene glycol). An analysis of 7 additional esters is also included to assess how carbon chain length and functional group, interacts with these solvents (for a total of 105 odorant/solvent pairs). Our resulting equilibrium equations successfully corrected for behavioral sensitivity differences observed in mice tested with the same odorant in different solvents and were overall similar to published measurements using a gas chromatography-based approach. In summary, this method should allow researchers to determine the vapor-phase concentration of diluted odorants and will hopefully assist in more accurate comparisons of odorant concentrations across olfactory studies.

Indexed as

OdorantsSmellAldehydesAnimalsMicePropylene GlycolSolventsAldehydesPropylene GlycolSolventscalibrationodor deliveryolfactometry

Identifiers

PMID36571813
PMCPMC10208748
OpenAlexW4312198703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.