Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36571749›Full record

ArticleLa Tunisie medicale

[Medical experimentation on prisoners (part 4): the dilemma of 'pros' and 'cons'.]

Meriem Gaddas, Maher Jedidi, Mehdi Ben Khelil, Mariem Bel Hadj, Tasnim Masmoudi, Helmi Ben Saad

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meriem GaddasService de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles -EPS Farhat HACHED, Sousse-Université de Sousse Tunisie.
Maher JedidiService de Médecine Légale -EPS Farhat HACHED, Sousse- Université de Sousse Tunisie.
Mehdi Ben KhelilService de médecine légale, Centre de Traumatologie et des Brûlés, Ben Arous, Tunisie- Université de Tunis.
Mariem Bel HadjService de médecine légale-Hôpital universitaire Fattouma Bourguiba, Monastir, Tunisie-Université de Monastir.
Tasnim MasmoudiService de Médecine Légale -EPS Farhat HACHED, Sousse- Université de Sousse Tunisie.
Helmi Ben SaadService de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles -EPS Farhat HACHED, Sousse-Université de Sousse Tunisie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the long history of abuse of prisoners in medical experimentation, it is understandable that additional safeguards have been established to protect this social category. However, the debate between the detractors and the supporters of the medical experimentation in the prison environment is still going on. The present history note, the fourth in a series on medical experimentation on prisoners, intended to relate the main arguments of both sides: ie; the detractors and supporters of medical experimentation on prisoners.

Indexed as

PrisonersHumansPrisons

Identifiers

PMID36571749
PMCPMC9833318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.