Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36571744›Full record

ArticleLa Tunisie medicale

Reclassification of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (pMCT) according to the "Porto proposal" criteria.

Sarra Ben Rejeb, Dorra Aloui, Marwa Aloui, Hamdi Chouchen, Senda Turki

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarra Ben Rejeb
Dorra Aloui
Marwa Aloui
Hamdi Chouchen
Senda Turki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionpMCT is defined as a variant of papillary carcinoma that measures≤1 cm in diameter and which is characterized by an excellent prognosis. Recently, a proposal has been advanced to use the designation of papillary mirotumour (pMT) for pMCTs with no risk factors .

aimIn this study, we aimed to reclassify pMCTs according to the Porto proposal(Pp) criteria.

methodsWe have retrospectively collected cases of pMCT diagnosed in our pathology department over a period of 10years(2012-2022). Clinical and pathological parameters have been retrieved from the patient's medical records and pathological reports. We have evaluated all cases following the criteria of Pp. Cases that fulfilled all the criteria have been reclassified as pMT. We have briefly compared the clinical outcomes in both groups.

results29 cases of pMCT was found. Mean age of patients was 46,6 years-old (17-67) with a female predominance (sex ratio=0,45). 23 cases of pMCT were incidentally discovered. The tumor was located in the right thyroid lobe in 15cases. The mean size of the tumor was 5,2mm. Multifocality was observed in 5 cases. A total of 17 cases could be classified as pMT according to the Pp. Only one patient developed pulmonary metastasis and local recurrence; however it was related to the papillary carcinoma firstly diagnosed in his contralateral lobe. Clinical outcome was also good in the group of papillary microcarcinoma (pMC) with no recurrence or distant metastasis.

conclusionAccording to the Pp,>50% of pMCT could be reclassified as pMT which could reduce the psychological impact and overtreatment. Further studies with large sample size and molecular analysis are however needed in order to definitively validate and generalize the use of Porto proposal.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesThyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID36571744
PMCPMC9703906
OpenAlexW4313280101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.