ArticleLa Tunisie medicale
Systematic preoperative tests prescription in elective surgery: it's high time to appraise!
Article in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prescription of preoperative complementary tests aims to decrease morbidity and mortality associated to the perioperative period.
aimTo assess the practice and the financial cost of the systematic prescription of preoperative tests.
methodsThis was a retrospective study including all patients older than three years, scheduled for elective surgery from November 2018 to January 2019. Two attendings analyzed the data collected during the pre-anesthetic assessment and evaluated the usefulness of the ordered preoperative tests. The overall cost of prescribed preoperative tests and the cost generated by inappropriate prescriptions were also estimated.
resultsThis study included 1006 patients. The average age was 46.9 ± 22.05 years old. Five hundred and twenty three of them (51.98%) have no medical history. Among the planned procedures, 6.46% had an intermediate or major bleeding risk. Preoperative prescriptions were ordered by surgeons in 99% of cases. Prescriptions were justifiable in only 9.42% of cases. Abnormal findings were noted in 4.98% of the patients. The total cost was almost 80992 Dinars (≈ 24543 €). Complying the guidelines would save 70245 Dinars (≈ 21286 €) during the three months' study.
conclusionThe routine prescription of preoperative complementary tests results in a significant additional economic cost. Developing national guidelines would change this attitude of unnecessary prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36571743PMC9703908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.