Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36571673›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Bacterial identification in cerebrospinal fluid of domestic species with neurologic signs: a retrospective case-series study in 136 animals (2005-2021).

Márcio Garcia Ribeiro, Thiago Tourinho Pereira, Patrik Júnior de Lima Paz, Beatriz Oliveira de Almeida, Carmen S Araújo Cerviño, Carolina Aparecida Rodrigues, Gabrielly Terra Sartori Santos, Larissa Maria de Souza Freire, Fábio Vinicius Ramos Portilho, Marcelo Fagali Árabe Filho and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Márcio Garcia RibeiroDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil. marcio.ribeiro@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-9389
Thiago Tourinho PereiraDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Patrik Júnior de Lima PazDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Beatriz Oliveira de AlmeidaDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Carmen S Araújo CerviñoDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Carolina Aparecida RodriguesDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Gabrielly Terra Sartori SantosDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Larissa Maria de Souza FreireDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Fábio Vinicius Ramos PortilhoDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo Fagali Árabe FilhoDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Natália Rodrigues PaschoalDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Thaís Spessotto BelloDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Jane MegidDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Helio LangoniDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Camila Michele AppolinárioDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Secorun BorgesSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Rogério Martins AmorimSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Rogério GiuffridaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Western São Paulo - UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.
José Paes de Oliveira FilhoSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Amanda Keller SiqueiraSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern State University - UNICENTRO, Guarapuava, PR, Brazil.
Fernando José Paganini ListoniDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Antonio Carlos PaesDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade do Oeste Paulista · BRUniversidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) infections comprise life-threatening clinical conditions in domestic species, and are commonly related to severe sequelae, disability, or high fatality rates. A set of bacterial pathogens have been identified in central nervous infections in livestock and companion animals, although the most of descriptions are restricted to case reports and a lack of comprehensive studies involving CNS-related bacterial infections have been focused on a great number of domestic species. In this scenario, we retrospectively investigated selected epidemiological data, clinical findings, bacteriological culture, and in vitro susceptibility patterns of 136 nonrepetitive neurologic cases in domestic species (2005-2021). Bacterial isolates were recovered from 25% (34/136) of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampled. The isolates were obtained from cattle (9/136 = 6.6%), dogs (7/136 = 5.1%), horses (6/136 = 4.4%), goats (3/136 = 2.2%), pigs (3/136 = 2.2%), sheep (3/136 = 2.2%), cats (2/136 = 1.5%), and asinine (1/136 = 0.7%). Among animals with bacterial isolation, Staphylococcus aureus (6/34 = 17.6%), Escherichia coli (5/34 = 14.7%), Staphylococcus beta-hemolytic (5/34 = 14.7%), and Trueperella pyogenes (3/34 = 8.8%) were predominant, in addition to a miscellaneous of other bacteria isolated in minor frequency, e.g., Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, Enterobacter cloacae, Mannheimia haemolytica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus equi subsp. equi. In vitro susceptibility tests of isolates revealed that amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (11/13 = 84.6%), cephalexin (9/11 = 81.8%), and florfenicol (9/12 = 75%) were the most effective antimicrobials. Conversely, isolates exhibited resistance mainly to tetracycline (6/10 = 60%), penicillin (6/11 = 54.5%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (5/11 = 45.5%). Also, multidrug resistance to ≥ 3 classes of antimicrobials was found in 23.5% (8/34) strains. Data relative to the outcome was available in 79.4% (27/34) of animals that had bacterial isolation, and from these, the lethality rate was 92.6% (25/27). Incoordination (14/34 = 41.2%), recumbency (11/34 = 32.4%), apathy (10/34 = 29.4%), anorexia (9/34 = 26.5%), blindness (7/34 = 20.6%), seizure (6/34 = 17.6%), limb paresis (5/34 = 14.7%), head-pressing (4/34 = 11.8%), and nystagmus (3/34 = 8.8%) were the most frequent clinical signs. A variety of bacterial pathogens were identified in the CSF of domestic species showing neurologic signs, with a predominance of staphylococci, streptococci, and enterobacteria. High lethality of cases, poor in vitro efficacy of conventional antimicrobials, and a high in vitro multidrug resistance pattern of isolates were seen. Our results contribute to etiological characterization, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and clinical-epidemiological findings of bacterial infections in domestic species with neurological signs.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCattleDogsEscherichia coliGoatsHorsesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesSheepStaphylococcusStreptococcusSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial etiologyCentral nervous infectionsCompanion animalsLivestockMultidrug resistance

Identifiers

PMID36571673
PMCPMC9944471
OpenAlexW4312194515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.