ArticleCell and tissue banking2023
Allogenic bone grafts and postoperative surgical site infection: are positive intraoperative swab cultures predictive for a higher infectious risk?
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peripheral Nerve Decellularisation Protocol for Allogeneic Transplantation: From Tissue Procurement to Banking.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Transforming spinal surgery with innovations in biologics and additive manufacturing.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Infection After Fracture Fixation: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Application of Hydroxyapatite Obtained by Different Techniques: Metabolism and Microarchitecture Characteristics (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In spine surgery, allogenic bone grafts are often required to ensure bone fusion, however, the main concern regarding their use is the infection risk: therefore, an intraoperative swab for culture test is performed. The cost-effectiveness of these swabs and their influence on the patients' postoperative course have often been questioned. This study aims at determining whether positive spine allograft culture results are predictive of an increased risk of surgical site infection and whether they influence the surgeon's choices in postoperative management. The records of 340 patients who received allogenic bone graft during spinal fusion surgery in our institution were reviewed, for a total of 677 allografts. Each graft was swabbed intraoperatively. All patients were followed clinically for postoperative complications. Infection was diagnosed based on clinical data, blood tests and radiographic images, all assessed by an infectious disease specialist. Only 4 of the 677 allografts used (0.6%) resulted positive at the intraoperative swab culture. Three cultures were positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis and one culture for S. warneri. No clinical infection occurred in any of these patients. Twenty-eight of the 340 patients (8.2%) developed an infection, but none of them had a positive intraoperative swab culture. The most common microbiologic pathogen isolated from this cohort was S. aureus. According to our series, intraoperative swab culture results were not predictive for higher risk of infection and did not affect the clinical behavior of the surgeons in postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.