Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36571612›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Ultrasonographic and cytological characterization of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of cervical lymph nodes for false-negative and false-positive diagnosis.

Yiqun Ren, Yucong Shi, Zubang Zhou, Daxiong Yang, Jinhui Xie, Zhi Zhang, Jiao Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiqun Ren *The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (Gansu Provincial Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Yucong Shi *The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (Gansu Provincial Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Zubang ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 West Dong-Gang Road, Lanzhou, Gan su, 730000, China. 854296782@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2650-4122
Daxiong YangThe First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (Gansu Provincial Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Jinhui XieDepartment of Ultrasound, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 West Dong-Gang Road, Lanzhou, Gan su, 730000, China.
Zhi ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (Gansu Provincial Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Jiao WangGansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

Lanzhou Talent Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project Task Contract 2019-RC-119National Research Project Incubation Program of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital 19-SYPYB-26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe primary goal of this study was to examine the ultrasound and cytological characteristics of inconsistent cases (false negatives and false positives)of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) of cervical lymph nodes, to investigate factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration, and to improve diagnostic efficiency.

methodsThe results of US and FNAC of cervical lymph nodes in 562 cases treated at our institution from February 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. FNAC cytology results were compared with the final diagnostic results (242 surgical resections/core-needle biopsy, 320 cases followed up for more than 1 year), and the final diagnostic results were taken as the gold standard, and the ultrasound features and clinicopathology-related features were systematically retrospectively analyzed in cases of inconsistency.

resultsThe overall diagnostic accuracy of US-FNAC for cervical lymph nodes was 94.9%, with a false-negative rate of 6.7% and a false-positive rate of 3.8%. Analyzing the cases, sampling error due to factors associated with ultrasound features, such as larger, more numerous nodes, non-solid, hypoechoic, inhomogeneous, and increased vascularity are the main causes of false-negative diagnosis, while smaller nodules, overlapping cytologic patterns, and overinterpretation by pathologists are associated with false-positive FNAC results.

conclusionsProper interpretation of cytomorphologic and ultrasound features can improve diagnostic accuracy, and diagnostic misdiagnosis should be carefully observed, the identification of both features should be enhanced to reduce interpretation errors and sampling errors and to reduce the rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesUltrasonography, InterventionalBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansLymphatic MetastasisRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCervical lymph nodesCytology characteristicsFalse-negativeFalse-positiveFine needle aspiration cytologyUltrasound characteristics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.