Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36571417›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2022

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R.

Daxiang Na, Patricia M White

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daxiang NaDepartment of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester Medical Center.
Patricia M WhiteDepartment of Neuroscience, Ernst J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester Medical Center; patricia_white@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

Supplemental grant to Sufficiency of ErbB2 signaling in murine supporting cell proliferationR01DC014261 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WHITE, PATRICIA M. · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
Foxo3 Mechanisms in Noise DamageR01DC018660 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WHITE, PATRICIA M. · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014261NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many reports in the last 15 years have assessed changes in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveform after insults such as noise exposure. Common changes include reductions in the peak 1 amplitude and the relative latencies of the later peaks, as well as increased central gain, which is reflected by a relative increase in the amplitudes of the later peaks compared to the amplitude of peak 1. Many experimenters identify the peaks and troughs visually to assess their relative heights and latencies, which is a laborious process when the waveforms are collected in 5 dB increments throughout the hearing range for each frequency and condition. This paper describes free routines that may be executed in the open-source platform R with the RStudio interface to semi-automate the measurements of the peaks and troughs of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms. The routines identify the amplitudes and latencies of peaks and troughs, display these on a generated waveform for inspection, collate and annotate the results into a spreadsheet for statistical analysis, and generate averaged waveforms for figures. In cases when the automated process misidentifies the ABR waveform, there is an additional tool to assist in correction. The goal is to reduce the time and effort needed to analyze the ABR waveform so that more researchers will include these analyses in the future.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearingAcoustic StimulationAuditory ThresholdHearing TestsMotivationReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID36571417
PMCPMC10334475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.