ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023
Learning
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Social interactions between people of same and different generations shape longitudinal changes in interpersonal neural synchrony, loneliness, and social connection.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Parental speech and gesture scaffolding moderate the neural dynamics of parent-child synchrony.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Exploring the mechanism of analogy and explicit instructions on self-efficacy, performance, and learning of golf putting task: Analysis of mental representation.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- The effect of ostensive communication on immediate and delayed memory of novel and familiar action patterns.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Enhancing personal capacities in families with or at risk of type 2 diabetes: qualitative investigation of the GO EASY intervention.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Evolving Minds: Natural Learning vs. Artificial Learning in Ophthalmology Training.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Disaster Medicine Training for Medical Students in Lebanon: Quasi-Experimental Comparison of e-Learning and Face-to-Face Modalities.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Supporting quantitative skills in biomedical science with smart worksheets: intentions, impact and barriers to engagement.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- Social interaction shapes and boosts second language learning: virtual reality can show us how.NPJ science of learning · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review on Conversational Memory and Characteristics of Conversations in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Learning with others: teacher-learner brain synchrony depends on mutual gaze and joint attention.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Escape rooms as an interactive learning experience: insights into designing a radiology-themed escape room and exit survey data.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Coordinating Attention in Face-to-Face Collaboration: The Dynamics of Gaze, Pointing, and Verbal Reference.Cognitive science · 2025Article
- The Amygdala Regulates Social Motivation for Selective Vocal Imitation in Zebra Finches.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Interbrain coupling during language learning contributes to learning outcomes.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Multimodal analysis of mother-child interaction using hyperscanning and diffusion maps.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Abstractness and social interaction through a new lens: the potentialities of hyperscanning in naturalistic settings.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Shaping behaviors through social experience and their proposed sensitivity to stress.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Interbrain neural correlates of self and other integration in joint statistical learning.NPJ science of learning · 2024Article
- Association of frailty with workplace social activity, physical activity, and well-being among older employees: a moderated mediation in two income-variant samples.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning in humans is highly embedded in social interaction: since the very early stages of our lives, we form memories and acquire knowledge about the world from and with others. Yet, within cognitive science and neuroscience, human learning is mainly studied in isolation. The focus of past research in learning has been either exclusively on the learner or (less often) on the teacher, with the primary aim of determining developmental trajectories and/or effective teaching techniques. In fact, social interaction has rarely been explicitly taken as a variable of interest, despite being the medium through which learning occurs, especially in development, but also in adulthood. Here, we review behavioural and neuroimaging research on social human learning, specifically focusing on cognitive models of how we acquire semantic knowledge from and with others, and include both developmental as well as adult work. We then identify potential cognitive mechanisms that support social learning, and their neural correlates. The aim is to outline key new directions for experiments investigating how knowledge is acquired in its ecological niche, i.e. socially, within the framework of the two-person neuroscience approach. This article is part of the theme issue 'Concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.