Article in Ecologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
David H MillerUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Matthew EttersonUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9279-6258
Leah OliverUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecosystem Measuring and Monitoring Division, Gulf Breeze, FI 32561, USA.
Elizabeth PaulukonisUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Nathan PolleschUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8992-9294
S Thomas PuruckerUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
D Christopher RogersKansas Biological Survey and the Biodiversity Institute, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA.
Sumathy SinnathambyUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC 20004, USA.
Sandy RaimondoUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecosystem Measuring and Monitoring Division, Gulf Breeze, FI 32561, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1017-2001
Environmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of Kansas · US
Funding
Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Vernal pool fairy shrimp,
Indexed as
Branchinecta lynchichemical stressclimate changePop-GUIDEpopulation model
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Investigating Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Exposure to Organophosphate Pesticides: Implications for Population-Level Risk Assessment. · full record | OpenQuestion